Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Heavyweight\s+Q\s+Decals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Heavyweight\s+Q\s+Decals\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:21:48 -0600; My understanding from Marsh was that Microscale was not doing the decals at that time but would have the data he drew on file; we need someone who is 'close' to Microscale and/or get that official BR; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00006.html (12,076 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:24:47 -0500; I'll check with them tomorrow. Dave Lotz My understanding from Marsh was that Microscale was not doing the decals at that time but would have the data he drew on file; we need someone who is 'close'; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00007.html (12,553 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:27:01 -0600; Dave, Perhaps this is something your Q Connections might want to do as a special order, as you have done with the covered hoppers, etc. I suspect a lot of us would sign up for a set(or sets) of such; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00008.html (14,510 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:31:38 -0500; That's the plan!! Dave Dave, Perhaps this is something your Q Connections might want to do as a special order, as you have done with the covered hoppers, etc. I suspect a lot of us would sign up for; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00009.html (14,120 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:35:39 -0600; Great. Scott ________________________________________ From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave Lotz [Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:31 PM To: C; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00010.html (15,488 bytes)
6. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Carroll, Ed" <ed.carroll@heartland.edu>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:21:08 +0000; If the plan includes a set of these decals in N scale, then I would gladly purchase a number of sets, five to nine depending on how far along I am at the time. Ed Carroll ____________________________; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00014.html (18,109 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:27:21 -0500; Hi All, I just spoke with my contact at Microscale and they do not have the artwork for the Q heavyweights. So, Gerald, if you have contact with Marshall's family to see if they can find it, would yo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00037.html (12,150 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:48:08 -0600; I'll contact Marshall's family - hopefully though the drwgs are in Microscale in a file somewhere (they must have pretty impressive files given the range of decals they have produced) Gerald [Non-tex; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00039.html (13,313 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:45:14 EST; Dave, I would like to see: BURLINGTON - at least two different spacing's UNITED STATES MAIL RAILWAY POST OFFICE RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY - two line spacing and three line spacing BAGGAGE - MAIL CB&Q DI; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00052.html (12,951 bytes)
10. [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Michal Basta" <imibas@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:29:03 +0100; Listees, yes, it would be of course great if there would be decal(s) for any particular type of rolling stock one would like to model. But reality differs. I'm just quite surprised noone else mention; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00054.html (12,385 bytes)
11. [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:21:56 -0600; Mike - I'm sure that's exactly what's intended ("Burlington," "Burlington"); Rich's wish-list just includes what else he'd like on a passenger car decal sheet. And he pretty much covers it. Very well; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00057.html (13,569 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:45:26 -0800; I agree with Rich on the first list and while I can't speak for Bill I am not sure we need the second list as the express companies were consolidated in WW I. I also do not think we need the Pullman; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00070.html (13,918 bytes)
13. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:40:07 -0600; As Ken says, we probably don't need the word Pullman or the Pullman car names, since there is such a variety of names and some of these are in the Microscale 87-1221 PULLMAN set (for HO scale). As Ri; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00072.html (16,459 bytes)
14. [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 07:51:04 -0600; I hadn't considered Ken's point about bronze gold fading into the background. I have just one car lettered with the Champ gold and one passenger engine (w/Microscale I believe). They're in boxes at p; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00081.html (14,879 bytes)
15. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Ray Bedard <tczephyr@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:46:42 -0800; I also agree with Ken. Bronze gold fades on model trains when using any combination, mix or type of Pullman green paints. I have used both the bronze and deluxe, and removed the bronze decals. I use; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00085.html (16,722 bytes)
16. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "homanfamily" <homanfamily@fuse.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:48:55 -0500; . My experience in letting (decals) of Gold vs dulux is that the gold is hard to see. My passenger cars are either dark green or Pullman green. One problem is the the Foloquil Pullma n green varies w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00087.html (16,309 bytes)
17. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:52:48 -0500; Guys, I have to disagree. This is true when you use Champs decals - you almost have to double decal to be seen. The newest Champ decals in Pullman gold leaf are really superior. In fact, we were just; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00090.html (16,830 bytes)
18. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:05:24 -0600; This thread includes the term 'deluxe gold' to differentiate the gold leaf lettering used by Pullman in the 1920s and early 1930s from the yellow paint used later. Gold leaf was replaced by Dulux, a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00091.html (17,799 bytes)
19. [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Bill Glick" <Qglick@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:51:28 -0800; Here is my 2 cents worth. Ray and Ken got me looking at my models and I don't see any problem with the GOLD lettering from either decal sets. I have loaded some photos in PHOTO section under DECAL Is; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00108.html (12,142 bytes)
20. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Bob <drgw18@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:21:47 -0600; With regard to the Pullman lettering issues ("bronze gold" vs "Dulux Gold"). If you look at photos, movies and actual cars lettered with gold leaf ("Bronze gold") you will see that as time goes on, t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00109.html (15,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]