- 1. Re: [CBQ] Re: C&S Oil Burners (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Yarger" <ryarger@rypn.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 05:19:59 -0500
- I don't own one, but believe the Spectrum 2-8-0s have about 60" drivers, a bit large for the C&S, and more suited to those with 63" prototypes, such as the Rock Island, Mopac, Maine Central, etc.. In
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00001.html (11,404 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Re: C&S Oil Burners (score: 1)
- Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:29:44 -0800
- Thanks, Bob, for this very useful information. Regrarding the Spectrum engine, it's about what I feared. I was a little confused by your remarks on the Harriman 2-8-0. Couldn't tell from your sentenc
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00003.html (10,937 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: C&S Oil Burners (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Yarger" <ryarger@rypn.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:40:06 -0500
- I was referring to the brass Harriman 2-8-0s, which have 57" drivers, with 13 spokes. PFM and others have made these several times. The MDC Roundhouse model is somewhat of a mongrel, with drivers tha
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00005.html (12,822 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Re: C&S Oil Burners (score: 1)
- Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:25:57 -0600
- Don't be confused by the "Common Standard" on the title block of C&S motive power drawings...they don't refer to Harriman designs, but rather to C&S/FW&D designs (I think). At least one class of C&S
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00009.html (12,251 bytes)
- 5. [CBQ] Re: C&S Oil Burners (score: 1)
- Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:52:12 -0800
- John - What other (steam) power are you planning for your re-creation of the "transitional" C&S? I'm curious especially about smaller engines, e.g., their ubiquitous consolidations, and how you are g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-11/msg00229.html (8,884 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu