Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Locomotive\s+1374\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:58:35 -0500
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56808) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00000.html (15,241 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Erik Spoonmore" <Spoony81@att.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:55:48 -0600
And judging by the surrounding scenery its more California then Midwest Erik Spoonmore -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56809)
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00001.html (10,665 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:02:25 -0600
David, Yes, the locomotive in the photo is definitely a Santa Fe pacific type 4-6-2 no. 1374 and, I agree with Ed Pavlovic that the caboose is also Santa Fe. Furthermore, looking at the background of
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00002.html (9,933 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Woodruff" <mwoodruff54@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:09:50 -0500
There are tunnels on the Mopac west of St. Louis at Grays Summit and Labadie.  That load doesn't look excessively high in the photo, but no idea what the Mopac's tunnel clearances were like in 1936.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00003.html (11,722 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "David" <djross720@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:43:55 -0500
Michael, hi! This part of the story is pretty well recorded. The crate stood around 17 1/2 ft. above the rails and clearance routing was a huge problem. From St. Louis the train went to Alton, IL and
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00004.html (12,863 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "David" <djross720@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 11:15:43 -0500
Bill, yes.. what you say about the landscape crossed my mind when I found the clip, but I was so excited to find an image associated, perhaps mistakenly or misleadingly, with the Burlington that I ov
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00005.html (10,862 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Louis Zadnichek via Groups.Io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:29:04 +0000 (UTC)
March 1, 2019 Archie - As our resident expect on the Q in Missouri, have you ever come across anything about this movement. Unless it happened entirely during night time hours, you'd think some newsp
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00006.html (11,930 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 15:17:02 -0600
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56818) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-03/msg00010.html (14,935 bytes)

9. [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "David" <djross720@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:43:42 -0500
Hello, all... I've been poking around still trying to turn up information on the 1936 shipment of the Palomar mirror cross country.  I imagine it's going to take a visit to the Newberry Library to sa
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00114.html (11,680 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Erik Spoonmore" <Spoony81@att.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:07:21 -0600
Hello, all... I've been poking around still trying to turn up information on the 1936 shipment of the Palomar mirror cross country. I imagine it's going to take a visit to the Newberry Library to sa
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00115.html (12,066 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "BRIAN PAUL EHNI" <bpehni@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:16:44 -0600
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56803) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00116.html (14,411 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "BRIAN PAUL EHNI" <bpehni@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:17:59 -0600
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56804) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00117.html (14,971 bytes)

13. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Harding" <doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:33:15 -0600
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56805) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00118.html (13,457 bytes)

14. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "David" <djross720@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:44:02 -0500
So, a Pacific type, and a Santa Fe? But not a Burlington? Do I have that right? Another unanticipated detail. So, credit to James Murphy might be spurious too? And so I still cant say what the CB& Q
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00119.html (9,356 bytes)

15. Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374 (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Pavlovic" <cbq168a@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:13:29 -0600
The waycar in the photo also has more of a ATSF look to it than CB&Q as well. Ed Pavlovic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#568
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-02/msg00120.html (9,727 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu