BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374

To: <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374
From: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:58:35 -0500
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1551445122; bh=CP0S+cNJBkFUk2C2Vxi7Mbzxsbd/J5w7PPp6qUgynaw=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=F+B9XVMjqsp0AXi6wLB39OyeVLayqtYpmOawCAZpnfb6YnCGP2gyMmla7mSVgu0t7FF 7laBJynA1MJr0r3FdoRyfDoTukPNxRX2sZEvy15SFWzuHPC3sZviXo0ymiiumgJHJ/kQm hjycQPvg/5D1B7j0ZYV+MtHTHLyz6QspbRM=
In-reply-to: <A8354DE7-1FB5-4B89-9307-61C49B98CF9B@gmail.com>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <9372d6d0-079c-ca04-14fb-f29fff73f443@sbcglobal.net> <191470B4-F963-4306-9F55-81C20F104DE5@att.net> <A8354DE7-1FB5-4B89-9307-61C49B98CF9B@gmail.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
Thread-index: AQJ0MQ/b1mrJEVW4msfByPhjUSgGnwImac2vAcYBnFGkmJdeMA==

The caboose also looks like an ATSF caboose.

 

Dave

 

From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> On Behalf Of BRIAN PAUL EHNI
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 11:18 PM
To: CBQ groups.io <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374

 

1374 was a 4-6-2

 

 

Thanks!
--

Brian Ehni

 

 

From: "CBQ groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of Erik Spoonmore <Spoony81@att.net>
Reply-To: "CBQ groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io>
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 10:07 PM
To: "CBQ groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Locomotive 1374

 

1374 isn’t a CB&Q engine. The CB&Q wouldn’t have had numbers on the tender just the Burlington Route herald 

Erik Spoonmore 


On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:43 PM, David <djross720@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Hello, all... I've been poking around still trying to turn up information on the 1936 shipment of the Palomar mirror cross country.  I imagine it's going to take a visit to the Newberry Library to satisfy me, but in the meantime I turned up a bit of a clue.  Because I hadn't been able to turn up anything at all, apart from a few scant descriptions in newspaper articles from the period (April 1 in St. Louis, etc.) let alone photographs, I had about decided that because it was just a "short" hop from St. Louis to K.C. there must have been a haulage agreement to take the thing over intact from the NYC under a C. B.&Q. crew.  But, no!  Just tonight I found a clip of film footage that clearly shows Locomotive 1374 - a clip credited "James Murphy  C. B.&Q. Railroad"   -from the 2008 documentary, The Journey to Palomar.  The NYC's 2714 Mohawk took it from Corning to St. Louis and the Santa Fe's 3157 Mikado took it from K.C. to Pasadena (I guess it's an assumption that no engine change was necessary along the way), but the CB&Q's contribution needs to be filled in!  The histories tell that James Murphy was a safety and loss engineer for the Burlington who accompanied the train from Corning to K.C.   Can anyone tell me anything about the 1374?  I've attached a screen shot...

Thanks,

Dave Ross

North Canton, OH

 

<1374 Burlington.jpg>

_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#56808) | Reply To Group | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>