Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+9123\s+or\s+not\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 19:48:05 +1200
There&#8217;s a photo on eBay at http://www.ebay.com/itm/7F194-RP-1937-60s-CB-Q-BURLINGTON-RAILROAD-ENGINE-9123-CHICAGO-IL-/401371515012?hash=item5d739b4884:g:EukAAOSw8edZdTQ5 which purports to be Mi
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00152.html (14,408 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:08:11 -0400
July 25, 2017 Rupert - The Midwest unit shown in the EBay image is NOT the Q's 9123. This is a larger locomotive. And I do not have an image of Midwest 101 painted in Burlington colors. Perhaps, anot
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00164.html (15,819 bytes)

3. RE: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:46:16 +1200
Louis You misunderstood me. Although this is advertised as Midwest 9123, it is in fact WV 101 (built by Cummings) at the time of its delivery, without any road numbers or initials being applied. It w
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00172.html (21,205 bytes)

4. RE: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:30:51 +1200
Louis Sorry &#8211; the bad news is that the photo shows WV 101 not FW&D 601. The good news is that, according to the Bulletin, no in service photos were known of 101, so you have a first! According
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00179.html (17,987 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:36:44 -0400
July 26, 2017 Rupert - Appreciate your expert sleuthing. Well done. The attached image is all I have. Wish it was higher rez, too, so we could see more detail. Best Regards - Louis Louis Zadnichek II
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00184.html (19,628 bytes)

6. [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:28:05 -0400
July 26, 2017 Rupert - I've looked again at the image of the Cummins unit. The first numeral on the steam locomotive cab at far right is a 5. That IDs it as a 500 series Class G-10 0-6-0 type. They w
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00185.html (21,576 bytes)

7. RE: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "'Rupert & Maureen' gamlenz@ihug.co.nz [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:54:23 +1200
Louis The photo on eBay was labelled as being in Chicago . In the Bulletin &#8211; I only have an old photocopy so the quality of the photos is poor &#8211; are photos of the Cummings being tested by
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00186.html (17,780 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 20:15:01 +0000
Wow! My proofreading really sucks. Should have said the 101 got its stenciling at Childress, where it was tested for several days (and where the photo Louis posted was taken) . . . Hol From: CBQ@yaho
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00188.html (25,086 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:23:26 -0400
July 26, 2017 Hol - What would we do with you....... Many thanks for firmly IDing the Cummins image as taken at the 14th Street Coach Yard in Chicago. Plus, the image had not been airbrushed like I s
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00189.html (24,499 bytes)

10. Fwd: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:24:56 -0400
July 26, 2016 Hol - My proof reading isn't much better..... Should be "without" you. Best Regards - Louis From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: 7/26/2017 5:23:32 P.M. Central Daylig
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00190.html (25,675 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] 9123 or not (score: 1)
Author: "'sartherdj@aol.com' sartherdj@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:12:46 -0400
Like everyone else in this group we all appreciate the willingness of other members to write and share information and material from their collections so openly and freely. Later, Dave Sarther Tucso
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-07/msg00191.html (28,823 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu