Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Work\s+Rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Work\s+Rules\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: hogger41@a...; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:32:26 EDT; Leo, The lapback rule is still in use and I finally got paid after waiting almost a year. But it was at a much reduced rate from the 100 we used to get. I think I got paid 25 miles for this move. Gar; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00091.html (6,024 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 08:23:43 -0500; All, I agree with Greg, just used the latest message. Perhaps you need to look at it from a different perspective. I see many questions about why a particular locomotive or waycar was used on a parti; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00001.html (12,273 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:15:15 EDT; Russ - Can you give us a more detailed description of "lead qualified"? Does this have to do with the conductor's light & table? Bob [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00002.html (6,838 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:12:00 -0500; Bob, Yes, that's right. On the AT&SF side the problem is Air Conditioning. There is also an operating problem on Cajon & Tehachapi with BN units not having extended range dynamic brakes. And you can; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00004.html (7,960 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:32:55 EDT; <PRE>Sounds very interesting and worhtwhile, but you'll have to use language all of us can understand. What does "short on the hog law" mean?; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00010.html (6,676 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:48:43 -0500; Location and running time to terminal makes it likely that they will not make it under the Hours of Service federal regulations. language all; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00011.html (7,633 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Bob Weber" <eng95@a...>; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:32:41 -0700; For the benefit of non-railroaders in the group, can someone review the current work rules for train crews? How many hours/miles for regular time, ditto for overtime and at what point do the fed regs; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00015.html (7,815 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: BNJohn@a...; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:24:39 EDT; Bob, Federal law only allows you to work 12 hours on the railroad today. On the KCS we were given 10 hours undisturbed off if we worked 12 hours and we normally did every run. If you went dead you st; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-09/msg00019.html (7,883 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Marshall Thayer" <zephyr9903@e...>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:06:32 -0700; items are being scanned for posterity. < explain the work agreements and why and how they were what they were? < Marshall Thayer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00241.html (8,057 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: cttnghmrl@a...; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:24:12 EDT; I have been a railfan for almost 60 years but never worked for a railroad. I think your suggestion of articles about work agreements is excellent. I would like to see that sort of thing in the Bullet; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00242.html (7,354 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 06:49:56 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00246.html (10,251 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:05:01 EDT; Leo I think a Bulletin piece re work rules is an excellent idea. Those who have developed an interest in railroading in the "later days" have no idea as to the complex nature of the working agreement; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00248.html (8,074 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Norm_Andersen" <Norm_Andersen@m...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:06:13 -0400; John, Your plan sounds terrific BUT it shouldn't only be a recitation of the record. Rather insights such as yours, "The brick yd was a side trip down a rickety spur. are as interesting as the record; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00249.html (10,961 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:20:19 EDT; Leo We need more stories and even a bit of "puff" would be good. Go to it. Pete [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00250.html (7,762 bytes)
15. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@y...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:55:04 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00251.html (8,662 bytes)
16. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Marshall Thayer" <zephyr9903@e...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:05:04 -0700; rule items of interest, but to the non-employee they may seem dull. that's only my opinion. < For modelers, a discussion of work rules and their effect on operations would be fascinating, as well as; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00252.html (8,083 bytes)
17. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@c...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:44:41 -0500; Leo Work Rules are what made the railroad run and are an insite to everyday opeation Illinois Commerce Commission Docket No. 20617 was the order for the Lowell and Southern Railroad to be sold to the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00254.html (10,315 bytes)
18. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Ron Burkhard" <ronburk@d...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:25:19 -0500; Leo, I think it might be an excellent article, and that info definitely needs to be in the archives. To those none rails, it would give a glimps of what was typical of all railroads, and the "Q" in p; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00256.html (10,156 bytes)
19. RE: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: "Harold S. Huber Jr." <sarge9@f...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:37:16 -0600; Being interested in the Q only from a modeling standpoint I would find it awful boring. Harold Huber [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00258.html (7,869 bytes)
20. Re: [BRHSlist] Work Rules (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 18:18:19 -0700; A full printing could be dry but a selective condensentation could be interesting if they illustrate some of the lesser known rules. I have several "Rules and Rates of Pay" books but not working for; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00264.html (7,964 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]