Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Q\s+NW1Switchers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Q\s+NW1Switchers\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: Gordon Smith <kc2bw@w...>; Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 21:06:54 -0500; Hi Rich...Well there are two major external differences. First, the exhaust stacks on the SW's were offset to the firemans side. This was due to the Winton 201-A in line 8 cyl. engine, as opposed to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00033.html (7,695 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 21:46:30 EST; Hi Gordon! Thanks for the info. Sounds like an Alco Models SC would not be that good of a starting point to get those NW1's. Dennis Blunt thought he remembered a Trains model or Alco model of a NW1 f; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00034.html (7,542 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 21:25:50 -0600; horsepower standard That's what the NW2 was - 12-cyl. 567 @ 1000hp. The NW1 was simply a 201-engined NW with "some wiring changes" . . . The big changes between the Winton and 567 switchers were the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00035.html (8,065 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 23:11:41 EST; << That's what the NW2 was - 12-cyl. 567 @ 1000hp. The NW1 was simply a 201-engined NW with "some wiring changes" . . . The big changes between the Winton and 567 switchers were the hood-top flap ven; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00036.html (7,605 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: Gordon Smith <kc2bw@w...>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 08:18:37 -0500; Yup...It would take a major splice of the hood to stretch it. I only mentioned the SC model in case you want one. If an NW-1 was made in the 60's, I think I would forget it. It would be so crude. As; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00038.html (8,992 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: Gordon Smith <kc2bw@w...>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 08:18:26 -0500; Yup...It would take a major splice of the hood to stretch it. I only mentioned the SC model in case you want one. If an NW-1 was made in the 60's, I think I would forget it. It would be so crude. As; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00039.html (8,980 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 09:28:46 -0600; Rich: In the early days EMD linked HP to model type. That method soon gave way. Hence SW = 600hp, NW - 900 hp, FT = 1350 (1400 rounded up, so they used F, E unit - 1800 hp as in the EA model. ed; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00041.html (7,596 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:48:33 -0600; Winton was *not* an outside supplier. IIRC, it was acquired in 1930. Their straight 8 marine diesel was then evolved (under the famed Charles Kettering - "All we did was to build the diesel the way i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00043.html (8,441 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: "Harold S. Huber Jr." <sarge9@f...>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:41:03 -0700; All, The SW-1, my favorite switching diesel, has been arounf for a long time, altough they were under powered as time went on there are still some in service and have been since the start. Being a st; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00045.html (7,734 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: dlgrobe72@a...; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:31:42 EST; << The SW-1, my favorite switching diesel, has been arounf for a long time, altough they were under powered as time went on there are still some in service and have been since the start. Being a stea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00049.html (7,667 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: Gordon Smith <kc2bw@w...>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 19:26:03 -0500; Winton was *not* purchased by EMC. They *were* both purchased by General Motors in 1930. -- To reply take the 33 from the address; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00050.html (8,162 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Q NW1Switchers (score: 1): Author: <metcalf@a...>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 18:11:59 -0700; It's #10 at Alliance, Neb (or was the last I heard). Norm Metcalf time, to original nice; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00051.html (8,385 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]