Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+1898\s+CB\&Q\s+equipment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+1898\s+CB\&Q\s+equipment\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "Virginia Edgar" <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:21:34 -0500; Was rummaging thru an 1898 Official Equipment Register and gleaned the following for those of you who model the real "old" days or want something in a junk yard or sitting on the ground as a storage; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00246.html (10,876 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "zephyr9903" <zephyr9903@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:33:51 -0600; (and then Marshall Thayer intersperses comments, questions & speculations) It's not too likely these were literally "hearse cars" in the sense we've seen on interurban lines, which often had direct a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00248.html (13,583 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@cwia.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:13:35 -0700; The MDC stock car makes good stand in for the Class SM-7 a modification of the door is needed. Labelle makes a stock car (FW&D, CM) that makes a good stand in for a class SM-6. I built two MDC cars u; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00249.html (10,333 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 21:04:35 +1200; Gerald referred to the Furniture cars which had an internal height of 8' or more, which was about 2' taller inside than a box car of the era. I can't think of any furniture/household effects that wou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00263.html (10,682 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 04:32:25 -0500; Rupert, Furniture, by it's nature, is a very light commodity. During the 70's Ethan Allen was shipping a couple cars a week from somewhere in the Southeast to unload at the team tracks along the stre; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00264.html (11,576 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@cwia.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:04:21 -0700; Rupert, There is a photo and plans of the 40' furniture car in I believe the 1898 Car Builders Cyclopedia and reprinded by Gregg as a Train Shed Cyclopedia(which at the moment I can't find). Car 40'; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00271.html (10,273 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:11:20 +1200; Russell & Ken Thanks for your responses re. furniture and woodenware cars. Still on the subject of the 1898 era, I notice that "coal and flat" cars were often recorded together (in addition to "coal; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00273.html (9,724 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 05:52:09 -0500; Rupert/Ken, Slightly on the same topic, "big cars for light loads", the CB&Q 86' box cars were really not in parts service for very long. Don't think they were able to establish any great volume of b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00274.html (11,353 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] 1898 CB&Q equipment (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:23:32 -0500; Rupert, I would say "yes". If you start reading about early railroad construction the first thing every railroad bought was flats and the second was box cars. The flats would be useful during the con; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-09/msg00275.html (13,002 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]