Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+C\&S\s+Hoppers\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] C&S hoppers (score: 1)
Author: qutlx1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Mike, What I can share with certainity is that we spotted a C&S hopper at Builders Supply in Aurora,IL in the early to mid 70s with a load of landscaping rock in it. At that time Builders Supply was
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-06/msg00051.html (10,022 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] C&S hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
We would see C&S hoppers occasionally in the coal fields especially the 70 tonners and later the 100 tonners. And in the early fifies the composite gons showed up a lot (remember this was the time of
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-06/msg00052.html (11,067 bytes)

3. [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Michels" <gjmichels53@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 13:27:45 -0700
Hi Folks, This may be taken several different ways, but I assure you I am simply searching for information. Earlier this year the Amarillo Railroad Museum produced a Broadway Limited C&S HT-10C hoppe
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00039.html (12,022 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Hollis via groups.io" <dfhollis=comcast.net@groups.io>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 21:20:01 -0500 (CDT)
A C&S car is always a welcome addition as were the FW&D covered hoppers. However, at least in my book, Chinese Red paint dates the equipment to the latter days. I run steam so you wouldn't see anythi
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00041.html (13,992 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:35:42 +0000
The problem with the HT-10C is that they were built in 1960, so they were delivered in Chinese Red. The HT-10 and HT-10A were built in 1953 or before, so they are of more interest to transition era m
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00042.html (15,128 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Michels" <gjmichels53@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:09:14 -0700
Great comments. It seems the transition era is still the era with the most interest. Modern (1980 or after) is strong also. The 1960s era seems to be a is a dangerous market. We noticed this with an
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00043.html (12,165 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Don Winn" <donswinn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:55:49 -0500
I recently read a commentary by Jason Shron (owner of Rapido Trains) in RMC.  He was also befuddled by the fact that modelling has jumped over the 60s and 70s decades.    Some folks call it the dark
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00044.html (13,982 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "popbumper1" <popbumper1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 18:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Personally, doing Pre-BN roads/merger time, I'm all about the 60's and 70's. Opinions differ, but I think this was one of the most interesting times in railroading...so many first and second gen dies
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00046.html (16,639 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 18:21:33 +0000
When I first dabbled in model railroading between 1976 and 1981, I modeled ATSF in Oklahoma in the 60s exclusively with Athearn cars and Atlas and Athearn motive power. I moved to Iowa and was consum
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00047.html (17,748 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Keil" <rkeil6721@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:15:32 +0000
I think there are plenty of 60-70s modelers, I know quite a few. I think it might come down to car type and railroad. In my opinion, the 60s and 70s modelers really focus on larger covered hoppers an
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00048.html (16,982 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Frietsch" <eaglecrestservices@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:10:18 -0700
Hi All After reading all the other emails about the time frame people are modeling I believe quite a few of us model the 60s and early 70s. I believe the main problem is that these cars are $40 AAR 7
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00052.html (14,115 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kraus via groups.io" <jkraus05=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:40:43 +0000 (UTC)
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#66667) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@na
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00054.html (15,146 bytes)

13. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:07:24 +0000
Remember when Athearn blue box kits were under two dollars and a bottle of Floquil was under a dollar. I tracked my model expenses in Quicken from 2008-2016, including travel expenses to meetings, st
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00057.html (18,259 bytes)

14. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "scott myers" <myers.scottv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:13:46 -0500
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#66672) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@na
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00059.html (15,920 bytes)

15. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Keil" <rkeil6721@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:21:39 +0000
Well, I guess I got the car type wrong! But I think the same applies to open hoppers. Ricky Keil Get Outlook for iOS From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of Rick Keil <rkeil6721@hotmail.com>
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00060.html (18,115 bytes)

16. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "William Hirt" <whirt@fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:52:37 -0500
Just a quick point. An Athearn blue box kit in 1972 cost $1.98. That same kit would cost nearly $15 today based on inflation. Accurail kits have better molding, detailing, painting and lettering and
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00064.html (17,557 bytes)

17. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:08:49 +0000
For more perspective, there is a sub-niche within the kit building niche its made up of resonators to use the term coined by the late Bill Welch to describe those who build resin kits. Within that su
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00066.html (20,844 bytes)

18. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Frietsch" <eaglecrestservices@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:31:21 -0700
So I have done some more thinking about this topic and the cars offered and realized I never really answered the main question that was presented. But first I must ask another question, where the c&s
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00071.html (14,412 bytes)

19. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:11:24 -0400
All, I would like to clarify that the this run of hoppers was a joint venture between the Amarillo folks and Q Connection working with Broadway Limited and they are not being marketed by Broadway.  W
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00072.html (15,770 bytes)

20. Re: [CBQ] C&S Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "William Hirt" <whirt@fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:54:26 -0500
Scott, I have a consist (attached) of a train of coal from Galesbug to Inland Steel near Chicago. It was a 109 car train. In the train were cars from: SLSF, CNJ, NYC, WM, PRR, B&LE, P&LE, CGW, RI, AC
/archives/BRHSLIST/2024-07/msg00075.html (16,459 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu