BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Rollers

To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rollers
From: "William Hirt" <whirt@fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:00:54 -0500
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1618416055; bh=iKrEVjDY7krCndnzmAWquMBWtrH1eK4JoDcCNQg/Bms=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=KwkgNibnIrkHyQFnIQA57hsfBoOYGKkYITEKUxdjf3n6UOhCAKsTjE3QNZDhUO3N1dA rLJJl0rx9UQR63vFMOn/YKncg+PfUHPmXWsV2sd9GdJ2Jr5Qwo3qxC1GmPHPVkAZiRI3Y SIS44POmDJ+lU6Z1mFvvUC47Q2Qrl98CXds=
In-reply-to: <17218.1618378571911759563@groups.io>
List-help: <mailto:CBQ+help@groups.io>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-subscribe: <mailto:CBQ+subscribe@groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ+unsubscribe@groups.io>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <021401d730cc$d62c7b60$82857220$@gmail.com> <17218.1618378571911759563@groups.io>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
One of the major costs listed in the 1967 CB&Q Perishable Report was getting cars to the C&NW Wood St. Produce Facility in Chicago. That quickly ate away any profit on the carload for the Q. The report had concentrated on three gateways - Grand Island, Kansas City and Denver. By far the most potential traffic was via Grand Island and the joint Q-UP run through.

I was just looking again at the GN wheel reports for 1968. In almost all cases, produce reefers that were terminating at Chicago were handed to the C&NW at the Twin Cities.  The produce reefers handed off to the Q were for through connections at Chicago like the B&O and N&W. This avoided giving the Q traffic which would be a certain money loser for them. I can not tell from the NP wheel reports if the same is true. But I would think the Q management made their parent roads aware of the cost situation. The GN routing actions suggest GN management was aware by 1968 and avoided putting Chicago terminating produce traffic on the Q.

Bill Hirt

On 4/14/2021 12:36 AM, leakinmywaders via groups.io wrote:
So maybe the profitability of the perishables business differed according to what shippers were located online?  Right through the 1960s the NP was still investing in expensive  mechanical reefers, ACF refrigerated Conditionaire covered hoppers, and insulated and refrigerated trailers. The annual reports, President's files, and periodicals show a great deal of enthusiasm  for maintaining and expanding the NP's share of shipping for a variety of fruit and vegetables, both fresh and frozen all across the NP system.  Hard to believe these  would have been mostly money-losing investments.

On the other hand, in sniffing through the president's files one does get the impression that in its final few years, NP management (at least at its top) was more concerned about gestures providing some symbolic assurance to shippers that a merger wouldn't curtail local services, while burnishing the railroad's image with shiny new equipment, than it was with the profitability of specific shipping arrangements, commodities, and fleet purchases. In the frugal Macfarlane years there had been meticulous cost/benefit analyses for every freight car purchase and lease lot (and for fleet retirement decisions), but those  kinds of analyses are much less in evidence in the files of the Menk administration.

I know this comment is NP focused, but the largest share of this NP-originated perishable traffic (and return routings of the cars) was handled by CBQ, so the Q was integral to supporting it.

Chris Frissell
Polson, MT


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#61854): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/61854
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82042734/703214
Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/xyzzy 
[archives@nauer.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>