|
THANKS Hol for all the info...I lived within 50 miles of Oregon all my growing up years..In fact my grandparents lived there as well as two of my mother's sisters and their families..There was always, in our family, lots of speculation and wonder about the OI....and here it is..and you found it. In fact that depot was within a few blocks of where my cousin's family and even closer to where my grandparents. lived. I admit, now that I've seen both of the photos you have posted that I have seen them before..I may even have them.
Isn't it interesting that one photo posted for one purpose can spark a plethora of interest and comment on something that is almost non existent in the original photo...If I hadn't opened up and enlarged the Q train image the OI train in the background would never have been noticed.
It "do pay" to look carefully at everything.
Thanks again
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 6, 2016 11:01 am Subject: Re: [CBQ] Can Anyone Identify This Image Sorry for not deleting earlier postings, but I'm trying to keep all three of the pertinent photos and the comments on them together.
It seems probable to me that the Oregon Interurban started operation in 1908 with one or two 4-4-0s and a coach or combine, then added the motor car at a later date. The 1917 Annual Report of the Missouri Public Service Commission lists the Oregon Interurban
Railway under the heading, "List of steam carriers operating in the state of Missouri under the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission which file tariffs with the Rate Department."
Two brief items in the Holt County Sentinel for Friday, December 15, 1911, may provide a clue:
"Two men entered the Oregon Interurban car the other day. There was but one vacant seat, but the man who was a little ahead, and really entitled to it, urged the other man to take it, saying that he really preferred to stand. 'This,' said the second man,
as he sank wearily into the seat, 'is what I call a case of genuine politeness.' 'That may be what you call it, stranger,' said the man who was standing up, 'but I call it one of the blamedest, tenderest boils I ever carried around with me in my life.' Moral:
Sometimes people get credit for what they don't deserve."
"Good November Business.
"Our Interurban railroad did a good business during November, handling 1,862,710 pounds of freight, of which there were 22 carload lots received and 27 carload lots forwarded: 23 of these were hogs. In addition to this it handled 31,619 pounds of express,
1,030 gallons of cream and 1,504 passengers."
The _expression_, "entered the Oregon Interurban car," would seem to refer to the motor car, while the fact that cars of freight were being hauled would seem to refer to the steam-powered trains. Possibly the coach/combine was used as a waycar on the steam
trains and provided passenger service in addition to the motor car. And the mention of 31,619 pounds of express justifies the Adams Express Company sign on the Oregon depot.
Hol
From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 7:45 AM To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [CBQ] Can Anyone Identify This Image I just checked Edmund Keilty's book,
Doodlebug Country, to make sure the Oregon Interurban was not listed among roads operating motor cars, and he does not show it. But he missed a number of other shortlines that had motor cars, so the omission really doesn't mean much The OI's 1908-1918
timeframe coincides perfectly with the widespread early development of gas-mechanical and gas-electric cars, and dozens of backwater shortlines employed such cars to cut operating costs.
As for the road's 4-4-0 or 4-4-0s, early 20th Century Burlington locomotive dispositions are sparse, and when they do exist they only show the date a locomotive was retired -- no real disposition is included. The fact that the
Oregon Interurban had its beginning in 1908, four years after the consolidation of all the component lines -- including the KCStJ&CB line the OI connected with at Forest City -- would mean whatever might have been sold to the shortline would have carried a
Q number by the time of the sale. The locomotive in the postcard view has no distinguishing characteristics that would allow us to definitely identify it as coming from the Burlington, but located as the OI was with only a Q connection (no pun intended, Dave
Lotz), it does seem most likely that the locomotive or locomotives came from the Q, though the proximity to Kansas City and St. Joe makes many more railroads legitimate possibilities.
Hol
From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Hol
Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 7:20 AM To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [CBQ] Can Anyone Identify This Image [1 Attachment] [Attachment(s) from
Hol Wagner included below]
The attached image from the other end of the depot at Oregon appears to show a trolley-like motor car of some kind rather than a steam train. Note the Adams Express Company sign on the end of the depot; that Q also used Adams
at this time.
Hol
 From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of LZadnichek@aol.com
[CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 4:03 PM To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [CBQ] Can Anyone Identify This Image April 5, 2016
Rick - I "think" this is the Oregon, MO, depot image that Pete is talking about:
It shows a 4-4-0. I had the same question as you after reading Pete's post, could the 4-4-0 shown be ex-B&MR or Q? Looks to be a pretty old locomotive. What say the locomotive historians in our Group? Best Regards - Louis
In a message dated 4/5/2016 4:51:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes:
__._,_.___ Posted by: jpslhedgpeth@aol.com __,_._,___ |
