As the final installment to the "new" Q roster, let's look at road locomotive
numbering:
First I need to mention that the use of 3-digit numbers on road locomotives can
be a problem if we expect our modern Q to become a huge railroad because we
limit ourselves to no more than 1,000 line haul freight locomotives. If this is
acceptable, we can use the standard Q freight roster to develop our "modern"
roster. There are interestingly a lot of hints as to where the Q was putting
new power, so let's look at this:
In the beginning, the first freight units, the EMD F-Units, were put in the
100-series with suffixes. The highest number was F7A 169C. SO that left 170-199
open.
When the 4-axle GP7 road switchers started coming in, the Q put them in the 200
series. The more powerful GP9's went right above the GP7's:
GP7 200-267
GP9 270-289
So except for starting the GP9's off in their own series (270's instead of
starting with 268), the Q kept the 4-axle first generation oad switchers
together. (Interestingly the Q did not seem to care if the different EMD
switcher models followed each other consecutively, so you have SW7's 9249-9268
followed by SW9's 9269-9270, followed by SW1200's 9271-9292. The same goes for
6-axle U-boats.)
The 6-axle contemporary of the GP7 was the SD7, and the Q decided the 6-axle
road switchers should have their own number series, starting in the 300 series.
When SD9's started arriving, these were also put in the 300 series:
SD7 300-324
SD9 325-374
In addition to the main road service SD7's, Q bought 12 lightweight non-D/B
SD7's for branch line service. To keep these separate from the heavier SD7's Q
put them in the 400 series.:
SD7 400-411
So if we look at the diesel roster build chronologically, instead of
model-wise, we see Q was splitting out the locomotives based on the number of
axles and asignment:
100-series: First generation frieght units (F-Units)
200-series: First generation 4-axle road switchers (GP7)
300-series: First generation 6-axle road switchers (SD7)
400-series: First generation 6-axle light road switchers (non-DB light SD7).
When the GP9/SD9's came out, the Q filled in the numbers after the GP7/SD7
units. When they did not have enough number slots in the 376-399 range for
their order for 30 SD9's in 1957 (some of which were single control stand SD9s
units) they put those in the 400 series, starting with 430. So much for keeping
the 400 series for "light" 6-axle road switchers! SO the Q was willing to
"change" their apparent numbering rationale when needed.
In 1959 the Q ordered its first turbocharged, 6-axle freight motors. So where
were these put? The 500 series of course:
SD24 500-515
In 1960, with the advent of EMD 567 turbocharged second-generation 4-axle
power, the Q decided these would go in the 900 series, starting with the GP20's
:
GP20 900-935
GP30 940-977 (note the jump to the 940 series)
GP35 978-999 (note the consecutive numbering from the GP30's)
Clearly the above shows Q sometimes jumped some numbers, other times did not.
When you are at 935 and have 64 more locomotive numbers available in the
series, it is easy to skip numbers. When you are at 977 and only have 22 slots
open, you aren't so picky!
In 1964 when the Q was buying its 2,500hp EMD's GE had its 2,500hp U25B
available, and Q started testing the GE waters. It ordered six U25B's. Where
would the new GE power go? By this time, all the early F-Units were gone, so
the low number 100 series was wide open. So the first order for GE road power,
the U25B's, went into the 100 series:
U25B 100-105
In 1965 GE had the 2,500hp 6-axle U25C available, which was competing with the
EMD SD35, but on the Q, the competition was the existing 2,400hp SD24's. So
when the Q bought U25C's in 1965, for whatever reason they decided the GE's
would go into the 500 series, along with the EMD SD24's, starting at 550,
instead of starting a new 600 series for 6-axle GE's. This "jump" would give
room for more high horsepower 6-axle EMD's, and did come in handy later. It
also parallels the earlier WWII switcher numbering scheme where the Alco S-2's
were nubered 9300-9308, and Baldwin VO1000's started at 9350 up to 9379.
In 1966 Q went back to GE for the more powerful U28C version of the U25C
locomotives, and bought Phase I U28C's 562-577. These were numbered right
behind the U25C's. So here is what the 500 series looked like in 1966:
SD24 500-515
U25C 550-561
U28C 562-577
In 1966 the Q also bought 20 U28B's from GE. This is one of the most peculiar
roster numberings on the Q. By the time the Q had ordered U28B's GE was in the
Phase II carbody, which included the introduction of the classic, stubby U-boat
nose (first introduced on the U25C) to the 4-axle U-boat line. The Phase II
U28B also had a larger and redesigned radiator system from the U25B that would
allow it to be upgraded to a 3,000hp U30B (wich Q did in fact do with its
U28B's). The U28B's were put into two very distinct number series:
U28B 106-115 (following the U25B's)
U28B 140-149
So the Q was clearly planning on using the low 100's, once the domain of EMD
F-Units, for high horsepower GE 4-axle road switchers. Here is where the
numbering gets even stranger, however, beyond the questionof why the Q skipped
from 115 to 140 on U28B's. The 20 U28B's in the 106-115 and 140-149 series were
all part of the same order and had 20 consecutively numbered builders numbers.
But they were as follows:
U28B 106-110 Builders Numbers 36101-36105 Built 10-66
U28B 140-149 Builders Numbers 36106-36115 Built 10-66 and 11-66
U28B 111-115 Builders Numbers 36116-36120 Built 12-66 and 01-67
Why did the Q start with 106-110, switch to the 140 series, then come back to
111-115 on these locomotives? If anyone has any insight, please let us know!
At this point, we are at the era of the new generation of EMD 645 powered road
switchers (GP40, SD40, SD45), and high horsepower (3,000hp and above) GE's,
like the U30B, U30C, and U33C. While the GP40's were coming at the same time as
the U28B's, I will cover these and Q's roster system for the last generation of
power, along with the insight we have as to where newer power was going to be
numbered, in the next installment.
Tom Mack
Cincinnati, OH
--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Dwight" wrote:
>
> Has anyone developed a modern day locomotive roster and what the possible
> numbering systme might be? I saw one for the Milwaukee Road and found it very
> interesting. I am modelling the Q in a modern day setting with AC4400's and
> the like but have yet to develope a locomotive numbering scheme.
>
> I also have the Q running passenger trains and I am using E-9's, FP-45's and
> 8-40BWH's.
>
> If anyone has already made one or can assist me, I would appreciate it. I am
> not the smartest cookie when it comes to trying to keep true to the Q way of
> doing things.
>
> Thanks,
> Dwight
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|