Re: [CBQ] Re: Fire Insurance

[Rhonda <macon249@yahoo.com>]

Yes, most rail insurance had exceptions. Generally they would not pay out for Rule G, which is drunk or just being a no show at work or theft. It is very easy to get discipline time off or be dismissed from service. It is just the way the railroad works. A lot of insurance was only good for once a year. We use to like to give them 5 or 10 days. They would have second thoughts about turning it in. I have even had guys ask for 60 days on an offense so they could draw and be off longer. They got paid anyway so why not.

Bill Jackson

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 20, 2012, at 9:26 PM, qutlx1@aol.com wrote:

 

Chuck,

 

Both the BRCF and the UTU had exclusions for rule G violations. It was one thing to make a mistake or be a victim of circumstances but the funds weren't going to pay for willful rule violations.

 

Leo Phillipp

This message cannot be displayed because of the way it is formatted. Ask the sender to send it again using a different format or email program. multipart/alternative

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___