To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Aurora |
From: | Bob Webber <cz17@comcast.net> |
Date: | Fri, 21 May 2010 18:59:45 -0500 |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1274486391; bh=yDyeTmVkPmyiM4QE7FnM+kpuUsYKmm++AAi4Fg0etxo=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-Id:X-Mailer:To:In-Reply-To:References:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=J9PB2Qb/V/YGt7Oe858bBpFRinf1iyxMP9QVzAc0h3cIIfOSeC68YWlnVsfMsRQi4+BrjRi3hSazlCLIO4iyGIROC67U2l+zukaoB6HrJUrVm01KzLJYnyfkl+ZqGa6P |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=paDKZz4/wWPLb1uYSCqWTZA/FzaLuqgYIhC0oca3RZmBb52wtBRyfublzC+5rC6Wg63tKDooC5EEiheDfDBRe2yddtdzkOQ5jQJxwL81IANR+uMZrX9ZiIWqNtkAHwML; |
In-reply-to: | <EAFC215EBA8A42E98D78CD35ED53DE0D@charliepc> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <123667.15627.qm@web180106.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <EAFC215EBA8A42E98D78CD35ED53DE0D@charliepc> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Well... Blomberg was a Pullman engineer, THEN an EMC/EMD engineer. The the earlier worms were designed by him (in terms of the car body a& trucks). The EA was, I think, the first EMC locomotive with the 3 axle trucks. The E1s and E2s were just a little bit later. But he did design all the power trucks on the UP articulated sets. So... At 06:40 PM 5/21/2010, you wrote: >I was just wondering how and on what EMD tested the A1A truck..... >if indeed the welded Blomberg under the Silver Charger was a >prototype.... seems to me that the 511 or 512 would have been a >reasonable candidate for testing. >Charlie Vlk > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >------------------------------------ > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Bob Webber [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Aurora, cvlk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] 511 at Aurora, cvlk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Aurora, cvlk |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] 511 at Aurora, cvlk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |