Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Why\s+two\s+routes\s+to\s+Streator\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Why\s+two\s+routes\s+to\s+Streator\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator? (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 09:35:27 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I am trying to figure out just why the Q went thru the expense of crossing the Illinois River twice to get to Streator. First they crossed the river at Ottawa with their Montgomery to Streator branch; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-10/msg00095.html (10,349 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator? (score: 1): Author: roy wojahn <zuch2rew@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:55:22 -0700 (PDT); Could I offer a guess why the two routes? In the time I lived along the "Q", I know that a lot of out the Streator branch to Chicago was the silica sand. My guess is it went to users in the Chicago a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-10/msg00096.html (11,836 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator? (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:22:28 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Remember that the Q connected with the the NYC Kankakee Belt at two locations, Streator and Zearing, so traffic on the Montgomery-Streator line only had to go down to Streator to move to points east,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-10/msg00097.html (11,250 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator? (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:02:23 -0700 (PDT); Coal mining in the State of Illinois got its start when Marquette found the first cole(french spelling)along the banks of the Illinois on his first trip thru the area. There were coal mines all along; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-10/msg00103.html (12,386 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator? (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:04:37 -0700 (PDT); Problem was brought up in a meeting Why run thru Chicago and the vandalism Answer was We would not want to short haul ourselves Reason given for not using the Kankee Belt by BN SJH roy wojahn <zuch2r; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-10/msg00104.html (12,134 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator? (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:39:22 -0500; Steve, I do not think that either the AT&SF or currently the BNSF "Short Haul" themselves on anything. Both roads had/have concurrences with the NYC/PC/CR, and now the NS that any Chicago interchange; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-10/msg00108.html (10,985 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]