BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator?

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Why two routes to Streator?
From: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=tuv4FWTOKs4/F1n/A5OUoJG3P4VcxXfZ+MsArXiwLqTNNjf1wXyFbrRL1mGWi9r/t2b5AbYoYRlpDcP6OlTI/hbxtfvaabbHdvfzjb1M1AgXNfSqXYy0I60iW2l8X8GL;
In-reply-to: <977467.68631.qm@web52208.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Problem was brought up in a meeting 
Why run thru Chicago and the vandalism
Answer was We would not want to short haul ourselves
Reason given for not using the Kankee Belt by BN
SJH

roy wojahn <zuch2rew@yahoo.com> wrote:                               Could I 
offer a guess why the two routes?  In the time
 I lived along the "Q", I know that a lot of out the
 Streator branch to Chicago was the silica sand.  My
 guess is it went to users in the Chicago area or
 furtherr eastbound via connections.
 
 At some time the connections with the Kankakee Belt
 (NYC) were important.  The belt line around Chicago
 was a big selling point.  Why route that traffic back
 toward the big city?  Besides, didn't some of that
 sand head west?  What about the zinc mines?  Did that
 traffic need to go to Chicago?
 
 --- Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com> wrote:
 
 > I am trying to figure out just why the Q went thru
 > the expense of crossing the Illinois River twice to
 > get to Streator.  First they crossed the river at
 > Ottawa with their Montgomery to Streator branch.
 > Later they built the IV&N, and it too crossed the
 > Illinois River (at La Salle) in order to get to
 > Streator.  It seems to me that must have had some
 > very important reason to go thru the enormous
 > expense of building that second Illinois River
 > bridge at La Salle, it's not the like the Q bought
 > out a rival railroad that already had a bridge
 > there.  Was there some important traffic source
 > south of the river?  Did they have bigger plans for
 > the IV&N than Streator? If anyone can enlighten me I
 > will greatly appreciate it.
 > 
 > Thank you kindly,
 > 
 > Mike Matalis
 > Downers Grove IL
 > 
 > 
 > 
 
 __________________________________________________________
 Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, 
news, photos & more. 
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
 
     
                               


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>