Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+What\'s\s+Wrong\s+With\s+5030\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:11:41 -0600
I am not sure what I am looking at but there seems to be something I&#8217;ve not seen before going on in the area of the Turret&#8230;..a hip roofed box of some sort. The eccentric looks odd but it
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00025.html (15,861 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:25:06 -0500
February 3, 2015 Charlie - You're close, but not quite there. Clue number two, continue thinking "lignite." Best Regards - Louis In a message dated 2/3/2015 3:11:49 P.M. Central Standard Time, CBQ@ya
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00026.html (17,247 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Noel georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:22:55 -0500
The handrail on the tender appears to be bent upwards. Also the lead tender truck may be on the ground as the person is looking at something around that area. Noel On 2/3/2015 4:25 PM, LZadnichek@aol
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00028.html (21,586 bytes)

4. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:52:14 -0600
__._,_.___ Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups &bull; Privacy &bull; Unsubscribe &bull; Terms of Use __,_._,___
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00033.html (20,735 bytes)

5. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 03 Feb 2015 17:14:57 -0800
5030 wasn't a lignite burner. Note that it doesn't have the L&B front end. Let's hope there was bituminous coal in that tender, yellow square notwithstanding. Jonathan __._,_.___ Posted by: jonathanh
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00034.html (13,377 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "'Kenneth Middleton' krmiddle@charter.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:29:55 -0500
What seems a little odd to me is that the square on the tender would seem to indicate a lignite burner, but the engine doesn't seem to have the extended smokebox typical of Burlington's lignite burne
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00035.html (13,884 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Myers myers.scottv@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:16 -0600
  As far as I can see, there's absolutely nothing wrong with the 5030.  No, it does not have an L&B front end, but that does not mean it's not a lignite burner, which in fact it is, as identified by
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00037.html (19,565 bytes)

8. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:39:13 -0700
It stands for Lignite & Bituminous, meaning a locomotive so equipped could burn either fuel. Hol To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:16 -0600 Subject: Re: [C
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00038.html (20,408 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Myers myers.scottv@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:40:25 -0600
  It stands for Lignite & Bituminous, meaning a locomotive so equipped could burn either fuel.   Hol   To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:16 -0600 Subject:
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00039.html (21,299 bytes)

10. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04 Feb 2015 09:40:47 -0800
Thanks for the very clarifying explanation, Hol, especially regarding the internal smokebox modifications that allowed lignite to be used as fuel without the extension. I stand corrected. I didn't ha
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00040.html (20,054 bytes)

11. RE: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:16:13 -0700
Jonathan: Looking at later assignment sheets (I'm going through tabulating all the C&S power leased to the Q through the years), the 5030 was transferred to the Omaha Division by August 1940 and to t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00041.html (21,312 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Ewinger bkewinger@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:14:34 +0000 (UTC)
Jonathan: Looking at later assignment sheets (I'm going through tabulating all the C&S power leased to the Q through the years), the 5030 was transferred to the Omaha Division by August 1940 and to
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00044.html (23,456 bytes)

13. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04 Feb 2015 12:19:17 -0800
Yeah, I guess we all got fooled on that one, Louis. I too assumed L&B front ends were necessary for burning lignite safely, and I had the same reaction you did about 5030 being used as a switcher in
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00046.html (13,220 bytes)

14. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:29:52 -0500
February 4, 2015 Jonathan - "Big nosed engines," I LIKE that. Very descriptive! I plan to share some more images of the Q's Big Nosed Engines....they came in several Classes (sizes). Guess you might
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00047.html (15,326 bytes)

15. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Atkins tcatkins@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:01:46 -0600
The coal in northern Wyoming that spills over into southeastern Montana is mostly low sulfur, sub-bituminous and some bituminous. There is a lot of Lignite in eastern Montana that stretches a little
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00048.html (16,325 bytes)

16. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Ewinger bkewinger@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 22:09:27 +0000 (UTC)
The coal in northern Wyoming that spills over into southeastern Montana is mostly low sulfur, sub-bituminous and some bituminous. There is a lot of Lignite in eastern Montana that stretches a little
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00049.html (17,455 bytes)

17. Re: [CBQ] What's Wrong With 5030? (score: 1)
Author: "jonathanharris@earthlink.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04 Feb 2015 14:11:45 -0800
I actually toyed with calling them "Jimmy Durantes of the Burlington Fleet." Hey if there can be a Mark Twain Zephyr, why not a Jimmy Durante drag freight? You probably know this already, but others
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-02/msg00050.html (15,726 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu