Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Station\s+vs\s+Depot\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Station\s+vs\s+Depot\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Station vs Depot (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:20:32 -0400; Hi all, May I make an observation? In railfan circles we often use the terms station and depot interchangeably, usually assuming that a station on the railroad is/was a physical depot building as i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-07/msg00172.html (26,311 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Station vs Depot (score: 1): Author: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@att.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:34:19 -0600; Dave, The AAR definition of a station is any point on a railroad identified by name or number while a depot is an edifice to facilitate the transaction of business. Some railroads have confused the u; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-07/msg00173.html (14,854 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Station vs Depot (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:43:11 -0500; You are a 100% right Dave. Even more so today, many 'stations' shown on ETT's are only place names for the benefit of Operating & Engineering employees so they know where a passing siding, change in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-07/msg00174.html (27,921 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Station vs Depot (score: 1): Author: John Manion <railbass@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:43:54 -0600; Hi there - As we are talking about Q stations and depots, I lived for four years in Fort Collins while attending Colorado State University 1963-1967. I remember C&S trains - and UP trains as well - r; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-07/msg00175.html (31,079 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]