- 1. [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "William Husband kybillhusb@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 06:55:27 -0400
- If it is possible, can these be put up on a web page or attached to someone's personal page? Doesn't need to be fancy. Thanks. __._,_.___ Posted by: William Husband <kybillhusb@gmail.com> Visit Your
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00119.html (13,287 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "t.m.j@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 28 May 2017 03:32:11 +0000
- Hi group, This is an awesome topic and also hope to see that list. But my main reason for posting was a great find a decade ago that I made while working with a club that I use to belong to. They are
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00125.html (14,942 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "Nelson Moyer npmoyer@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 12:37:32 +0000
- While railroad code differed from Morse code, an acceptable alternative is to recruit two ham radio operators as operators. I'm a ham, so I only need one more to run my Railroad. Nelson Moyer On May
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00126.html (16,863 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 14:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
- While railroad code differed from Morse code, an acceptable alternative is to recruit two ham radio operators as operators. I'm a ham, so I only need one more to run my Railroad. Nelson Moyer On May
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00127.html (18,547 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "dhartman@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 11:42:15 -0500
- "O'Hara" - you and Mayor Daley called it that. :) Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. From: STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ] Sent: Sunday, May 28,
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00128.html (21,062 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 14:41:10 -0400
- To be totally correct the original name was OLD ORCHARD..... ORD works better with accurate input. Pete "O'Hara" - you and Mayor Daley called it that. :) Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00129.html (21,601 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "dhartman@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 16:27:00 -0500
- I think it was Douglas Field first (Douglas Aircraft had factory there) but I could be wrong. Was it Old Orchard or just Orchard? Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00130.html (24,601 bytes)
- 8. [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "guguwich@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 19 May 2017 17:42:13 +0000
- While I appreciate the modelling aspect of the Q, and have noticed y'all take interest in its history, at least as far as major interests go, I will admit I am a wee disappointed that no one has resp
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00146.html (14,122 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 02:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
- While I appreciate the modelling aspect of the Q, and have noticed y'all take interest in its history, at least as far as major interests go, I will admit I am a wee disappointed that no one has res
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00148.html (16,248 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:08:00 -0500
- While I appreciate the modelling aspect of the Q, and have noticed y'all take interest in its history, at least as far as major interests go, I will admit I am a wee disappointed that no one has res
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00149.html (18,227 bytes)
- 11. RE: [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "'Dave Lotz' Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:03:14 -0400
- If there is a particular archaic topic that you would like to be discussed/covered, please feel free to begin the discussion here! I'm certain that the membership of the group would participate! Dave
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00153.html (15,906 bytes)
- 12. [CBQ] Re: Telegraphic Office Calls (score: 1)
- Author: "apo09324@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 01 Jun 2017 02:19:26 +0000
- The machine sounds like it is an Instructograph. I borrowed one in 1964 while learning code for my novice license as I had nobody to send code to me. The only drawback was worn paper tapes which resu
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-05/msg00154.html (13,491 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu