Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Silk\s+Trains\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Silk\s+Trains\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Re: Silk Trains (score: 1): Author: bbreynolds@aol.com; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:39:46 EST; Surprisingly, the Erie and NKP also got a noticeable amount of this traffic In that a good majority of the silk was processed in the mills of Paterson and Passaic NJ, the Erie connection (both cities; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00164.html (9,574 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: Silk Trains (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lambert" <dave@dglambert.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:22:39 -0500; Bruce, Thanks for "closing the loop" on this interesting piece of railroad history. Regards, Dave Lambert (former resident of Oreland, PA) _____ From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00168.html (10,699 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Silk Trains (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Harding" <doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:42:23 -0600; in the last century, but disappeared in the 30's. I believe it was invention of nylon that killed the silk industry. The trains did travel under guard, and ran on fast schedules. I think the book on; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00304.html (9,676 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Silk Trains (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:18:56 EST; I often refer to the ICC accident reports as those of you "usual suspects" know. There is a report...I think it's 1930's or maybe earlier of a silk train running as a B&O "passenger Extra" over the R; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00317.html (9,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]