Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Signals\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s+\-\s+West\s+End\s+Burlington\s+Yard\s+CTC\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:55:01 -0600
Dave, I remember the END CTC sign was for eastbound yard traffic off the westbound main and the Rock Island transfer track. It did not affect normal mainline moves at Main St. And as far back as the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00062.html (12,378 bytes)

2. RE: [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:59:44 -0500
Randy, It would help to know what years you're talking about. My 1953 employee timetable says the Westbound and Eastbound main were under ABS from Main St. West to Ottumwa. I don't know when it was c
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00063.html (13,422 bytes)

3. [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:55:02 -0600
Nelson, The time period for these Main Street CTC signs would be mid-to-late 1960's with my first hand experience from 1969-1971. I believe you will find CTC was extended to Lucas Street near the "tu
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00065.html (12,125 bytes)

4. [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:55:01 -0600
Glen & All, I got to thinking about this. The signal bridge in question was/is west of the Lucas Street crossing. The actual bridge location has moved 3 times if I remember correctly further downhill
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00068.html (12,923 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ewinger <bkewinger@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Glen & All, I got to thinking about this. The signal bridge in question was/is west of the Lucas Street crossing. The actual bridge location has moved 3 times if I remember correctly further downhil
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00070.html (15,417 bytes)

6. [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: wohrnell@kc.rr.com
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:38:50 -0500
Randy, I think is was the "hole" like you said. I don't remember it being called something different. Wasn't the new Hawkeye more or less the lead at the West end? Lenny Ohrnell Sent from my iPad --
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00074.html (10,902 bytes)

7. [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: wohrnell@kc.rr.com
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:13:02 -0500
Randy, We used to get turkey fries from them. Lenny Sent from my iPad -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Ind
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00075.html (10,734 bytes)

8. [CBQ] Re: Signals on the Q - West End Burlington Yard CTC (score: 1)
Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:55:02 -0600
Lenny, I think you are correct, the 'lead' split right at Main Street for the yard with the 'New Hawkeye', 'old Hawkeye' and maybe "Old Main." The 'hole' track went to the River track, House track; m
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00077.html (11,579 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu