Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Scanning\s+Negatives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Scanning\s+Negatives\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <j.kohl@wildblue.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:12:46 -0500; to a large collection of railroad prints (her husband's or father's?) and makes copy negs > from them to sell -- a clear violation of copyright law. She simply copies the information written on each; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00044.html (14,010 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@att.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:31:13 -0700; You're correct that she MAY have the rights to the collection. However, if she's selling copy negatives without specifying that they're copy negatives then she's violating the law on collectibles tha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00045.html (14,358 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: richtownsend@netscape.net; Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:10:10 -0500 (EST); Jan, You're right if her father or husband was the original photographer or somehow obtained the rights from the original photographer. But if the photos are just part of a collection, the original p; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00047.html (16,430 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:55:01 -0600; Jan is right. To summarily label an eBay seller to be in violation of copyright law might be slanderous without any proof other than a broad, reused eBay description. Further, only the copyright owne; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00055.html (15,496 bytes)
5. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:24:05 -0600; Re: Scanning Negatives Posted by: "qmp211" milepost206@mchsi.com qmp211 Mon Mar 5, 2012 10:16 pm (PST) Randy, Thank you to you and Jan for the detailed responses on this issue. I have two questions,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00061.html (17,879 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@att.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:04:06 -0700; See www.copyright.gov Yes, you can inherit the copyright. Also, the copyright doesn't begin until the item is published. There are several methods of copying negatives. Apparently Kodak has discontin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00062.html (17,398 bytes)
7. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:55:02 -0600; Hi Bill, Normally, the right to ownership transfers upon inheritance by will or codicil to the will. An enforceable copyright ends at life plus 70 years of the creator. So 70 years after your Father; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00064.html (18,058 bytes)
8. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:55:02 -0600; Norm, I'm not trying to be argumentative. But I would like to hear your reasoning behind your belief below. Thanks. Randy -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://grou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00065.html (11,365 bytes)
9. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:55:02 -0600; Copyright begins when something is created. http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html#mywork "When is my work protected? Your work is under copyright protection the moment it is created and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00066.html (11,756 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@att.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:41:43 -0700; It's fraud, criminal simulation and theft by deception. People who pay for what they think is an original, and instead receive a replica, are upheld by the courts Norm Metcalf, Boulder Colorado -- Ya; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00071.html (12,101 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@att.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:44:44 -0700; While it's true that the copyright, under current law, is inherent in the creation the enforceable period begins when it is published. Thus if you inherit an unpublished picture taken in 1900 and pub; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00072.html (12,573 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <j.kohl@wildblue.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:59:33 -0500; Hey, Bill! Randy did a great job of answering the other points. Unfortunately on your last point the answer is very difficult. It is certainly very hard to know how to lawfully traverse proper utiliz; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00081.html (17,304 bytes)
13. RE: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:18:33 -0500; It’s time to get back to discussing CB&Q-related topics. J Dave Lotz CBQ List Owner __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Dai; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00082.html (13,278 bytes)
14. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Hatler" <gnhistory07@live.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:22:42 -0600; Dear Friends of the Q, Almost all of the statements made here about copyyright are true. How likely is it that someone is going to sue YOU over a copyright issue involving a train photograph? Not ver; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00083.html (14,083 bytes)
15. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:55:02 -0600; You are correct only in the publication of a magazine or book. Photographs start the day they are created. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/gr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00085.html (12,581 bytes)
16. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:55:02 -0600; Sorry Dave, didn't see your post. Anyone can contact me off list. Randy -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: I; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00086.html (11,746 bytes)
17. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:10:31 -0600; Re: Scanning Negatives Posted by: "Jan Kohl" j.kohl@wildblue.net jan.kohl Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:59 pm (PST) Jan, Randy and all, Thanks to all who responded to my questions. I think that I have a better; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00090.html (16,583 bytes)
18. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: John Willis <willisjc@zebra.net>; Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:29:17 -0500; Bill, Possession is nine tenths of the law. You now own that property. The likelihood of a sibling taking you to court is pretty slim. The cost would be prohibitive and unless they are rich and just; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00091.html (11,357 bytes)
19. [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:32:28 -0600; Re: Scanning Negatives Posted by: "Dave Lotz" Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net dave_lotz Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:18 pm (PST) Dave, I don't fully agree with you that this subject is off topic. While it is not Q info; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00099.html (15,346 bytes)
20. RE: [CBQ] Re: Scanning Negatives (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:40:32 -0500; Re: Scanning Negatives Posted by: "Dave Lotz" Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net dave_lotz Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:18 pm (PST) Bill, While I value your opinion, I felt that the topic had been adequately covered and t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00100.html (20,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]