Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Question\s+about\s+the\s+U28B\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Question\s+about\s+the\s+U28B\'s\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: "BrianA" <briannpman@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:52:19 -0600; That is actually pretty logical. As there were only 10 U28B's it is doubtful they'd remain in solid sets after being delivered. In probably a week or two after entering service they were scattered al; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00051.html (11,282 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: "bkobielusz" <bkobielusz@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:44:59 -0600; They actually made it into Sheridan Wyoming quite often before the Merger and on mixed freights. I suspect they were put on in Alliance and ran through to Laurel Montana were they were turned and sen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00052.html (10,657 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:51:44 -0500; Brian, While I don't have an assignment sheet for the Q in that time period, I believe that all of the GE's were assigned to Lincoln Shop for maintenance. Early on, Lincoln specialized in GE training; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00053.html (11,567 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: "BrianA" <briannpman@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:15:33 -0600; Thanks for the info on the U-boat assignment. I should not be surprised that Lincoln would have been their assigned base. When I passed through Lincoln on a trip in July 1982 many of the U28B's were; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00056.html (11,728 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT); Brian, Did you recieve any info on TTI 257 and 258, former CB&Q 108 and 111? Are they still in service or did they become parts units to keep 255 and 260 running? I didn't realize that 260 was ex-Q; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00060.html (11,700 bytes)
6. [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: "BrianA" <briannpman@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:52:08 -0600; No, nothing current on the 257 or 258. Both were last noted in service in 2004 but no mention of them after that. Only the 255 and 260 are still running today. I have asked about the other two though; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00063.html (11,034 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:45:39 -0400; 258 is in pieces at Paris, KY. http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=1660621 Cheers! Jan Kohl -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00064.html (11,620 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Question about the U28B's (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:56:33 -0400; You can see TTI 259 (ex-CB&Q 112) going up in flames in 1999 here... http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=289587 Cheers! Jan -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00065.html (11,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]