Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+North\s+Coast\s+Limited\s+over\s+CBQ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+North\s+Coast\s+Limited\s+over\s+CBQ\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: "whstlpnk" <whstlpnk@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:04:56 -0600; All The NP Historical Association lists 1911 as the year the North Coast Limited went through to Chicago -- but over the CNW. As the NP/GN had the Q in their pocket for about a decade at that point,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00353.html (11,091 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:36:46 -0500; John- That is a question that has been bothering me as well.. The best explanation I’ve been able to come up with is that the CB&Q was using the old Union Station and they did not have enough c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00357.html (13,963 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:44:05 -0400 (EDT); I believe the official opening date for CUS was in mid-1925. Rich G. John That is a question that has been bothering me as well.. The best explanation Ive been able to come up with is that the CB&Q w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00358.html (14,578 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: "The Danish Duke" <shyguy_98665@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:04:57 -0600; Does anyone know if the Builder and the NCL back into CUS or locomotives first? I ask this because I have seen railfan videos taken over Roosevelt St.of trains reversing or going locomotive first the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00370.html (13,389 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:37:13 -0400 (EDT); Earl, In arriving, they would come in engine first. After all had exited, the switchers would pull the cars, turn and wash them, then take them to the 14th steet coachyard. for cleaning, etc. When th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00371.html (15,294 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: Art Peterson <artpeterson38@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:57 -0700 (PDT); Earl, In arriving, they would come in engine first. After all had exited, the switchers would pull the cars, turn and wash them, then take them to the 14th steet coachyard. for cleaning, etc. When t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00372.html (17,020 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:24:34 -0400 (EDT); Art, Are you saying that the Q would turn the train before they let the people off at CUS? Rich G. --Original Message-- From: Art Peterson <artpeterson38@yahoo.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00373.html (18,082 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: Ray Bedard <tczephyr@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:56:21 -0700; __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00375.html (17,031 bytes)
9. Fwd: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:24:23 -0400 (EDT); Ray, You are correct except for a fine point of clarification .The "quick clean up" on the dinkies in CUS was only on off rush hour(late night) trains. Everything else was backed out to the coach yar; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00387.html (20,328 bytes)
10. Fwd: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: "whstlpnk" <whstlpnk@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:55:01 -0600; The Northwest's Own Phil Beach came up with a little further information: ...The 6/2/1918 time table shows trains 1 & 2 operating over CB&Q. I do not have access to an earlier 1918 timetable... Does; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00388.html (11,773 bytes)
11. [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: "The Danish Duke" <shyguy_98665@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:55:02 -0600; Thanks to all for their input! I would see out here the rear cars of both the NCL and Builder that were either picked up or dropped in Pasco or Spokane, WA. The NCL and Builder cars on the SP&S`s "St; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00394.html (16,303 bytes)
12. [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: "DennisH" <dchenry@gustavus.edu>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:55:01 -0600; I experienced one of the back-in arrivals of "The North Coast Zephyr Builder" (as the late Jim Boyd was fond of calling the combined trains) in the summer of 1970. Our train leaving SPUD was 25 cars; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00398.html (14,802 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ (score: 1): Author: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:47:57 -0700 (PDT); Everytime I arrived at Chicago Union Station on a Burlington train, it always came in locomotive first. In June of 1966, our 20 car DZ came in 3 hours late from Denver, due to mechanical problems by; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-03/msg00401.html (19,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]