BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ
From: rgortowski@aol.com
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:44:05 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1333050259; bh=OzwB4UDdIsHz7JMchXxFia6gXvAdASNP44yGyBjRelw=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:References:To:In-Reply-To:X-MB-Message-Source:X-MB-Message-Type:X-Mailer:X-Received:Message-Id:x-aol-global-disposition:X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=jnF4u/YoLQ7+a7f8kartXLoXqU0GhvUNv5dFhBna+32zzuTAgqvy5SuYRapqifJTm2lq5hWSLh5BtTuFCv92I2yGbC2OXz8EIEUqoTj3sC+Mho2siJNH+aTRf/qPmRmu
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=Hape3jA3KT8g6kXMqjqQ/GvrfN1uhpEqs/CTnOnTDepgUWkjnihE6gFNWozCrP0nlQKYm/6z+hTGKYuo9DJGK7e/BAP+vhOxqqrCV6e+TgCdDX2qgNKmrIPWCuCZNUzW;
In-reply-to: <17e301cd0de3$48035e50$d80a1af0$@net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <jl0u2f+biv5@eGroups.com> <17e301cd0de3$48035e50$d80a1af0$@net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


I believe the official opening date for CUS was in mid-1925.
 
Rich G.


-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie Vlk <cvlk@comcast.net>
To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Mar 29, 2012 2:37 pm
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ

 
John-
That is a question that has been bothering me as well..
The best explanation I’ve been able to come up with is that the CB&Q was using the old Union Station and they did not have enough capacity to take on the NP trains.
I believe the shift to the CB&Q over the C&NW corresponds to the opening of the new CUS.  Might also have something to do with the competing GN trains already using the CB&Q.
Charlie
 
 
All-

The NP Historical Association lists 1911 as the year the North Coast Limited went through to Chicago -- but over the CNW. As the NP/GN had the Q in their pocket for about a decade at that point, why the _NCL_ was going over the North Western is a bit confusing. Does anyone know what date the _NCL_ shifted over to the Q?

RSVP
John Phillips
Seattle


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>