|
Art,
Are you saying that the Q would turn the train before they let the people off at CUS?
Rich G.
-----Original Message----- From: Art Peterson <artpeterson38@yahoo.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, Mar 30, 2012 11:17 am Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ Over the course of the years before Amtrak I saw both approaches utilized: most of the time it was locomotives first, especially if the train was running late.
Art Peterson
From: "rgortowski@aol.com" <rgortowski@aol.com> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ Earl,
In arriving, they would come in engine first. After all had exited, the switchers would pull the cars, turn and wash them, then take them to the 14th steet coachyard. for cleaning, etc. When the train would be placed in CUS for loading, it would be backed in, either by switcher, or by road power, depending on express/RPO requirements. CUS was a stub ended station except for two tracks that were used to get over to the North side (mostly used by the PRR.)
Rich G.
-----Original Message-----
From: The Danish Duke <shyguy_98665@yahoo.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, Mar 30, 2012 10:28 am Subject: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ Does anyone know if the Builder and the NCL back into CUS or locomotives first? I ask this because I have seen railfan videos taken over Roosevelt St.of trains reversing or going locomotive first then coming out the opposite.
Earl Poulsen Vancouver, WA --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, rgortowski@... wrote: > > > I believe the official opening date for CUS was in mid-1925. > > Rich G. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charlie Vlk <cvlk@...> > To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thu, Mar 29, 2012 2:37 pm > Subject: RE: [CBQ] Re: North Coast Limited over CBQ > > > > > > > John- > That is a question that has been bothering me as well.. > The best explanation Iâve been able to come up with is that the CB&Q was using the old Union Station and they did not have enough capacity to take on the NP trains. > I believe the shift to the CB&Q over the C&NW corresponds to the opening of the new CUS. Might also have something to do with the competing GN trains already using the CB&Q. > Charlie > > > > > All- > > The NP Historical Association lists 1911 as the year the North Coast Limited went through to Chicago -- but over the CNW. As the NP/GN had the Q in their pocket for about a decade at that point, why the _NCL_ was going over the North Western is a bit confusing. Does anyone know what date the _NCL_ shifted over to the Q? > > RSVP > John Phillips > Seattle > __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |