Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Q\s+heavy\s+weight\s+cars\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Q\s+heavy\s+weight\s+cars\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: "up4479" <up4479@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:54:11 -0600; Hi, Gang. If one used the Branchline coaches and Walthers diners as stand-ins and used various head end cars and perhaps some heavy weight sleepers, what mostly non streamlined trains could one model; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00125.html (10,165 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:09:21 -0400; On the K-line, heavyweight cars quite frequently showed up not only on the Zephyr Rocket (usually baggage) but also on the daily St. Louis - Burlington local (coach & baggage). The latter used to be; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00126.html (10,231 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:15:11 -0400; That's precisely how I'm using my heaveyweights. I've got two of the coaches for trains 1 & 44 as well as a couple of RPOs (I think they were RPOs rather than baggage cars). I've got another couple o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00129.html (11,468 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: Ben de Vries <ben1.vries@planet.nl>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:08:13 +0200; Duncan, What coaches and RPO's do you use, Branchline's or Walthers'? Ben de Vries, Holland -- Original Message -- From: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca> To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Satu; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00130.html (12,421 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:35:50 -0400; The heavyweight coaches I have are Branchline -- not a perfect match for the real 6100s but a very nice kit and they meet my budget. The RPOs are a combination of the Walthers 60' six window cars (ve; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00132.html (13,810 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:49:43 EDT; The Branchline single window coaches if memory serves me right is one window shy of the Q's 6100 series HW coaches. And ya know when they're finished, they look really fine. I know they're one window; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00133.html (9,716 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:05:20 -0700 (PDT); I can remember riding the "BLACKHAWK" St. Pauil to Chicago once in the 50's in a H'wt coach. It was wintertime so maybe Xmas time. Car was 3/4's empty except for servicemen. _________________________; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00140.html (12,333 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:14:16 -0700 (PDT); That's the 5 foot rule(10 foot in G gauge), if they look good, go for it. __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com -- Yahoo! Groups Spon; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00141.html (10,505 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Q heavy weight cars (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 04:13:31 EDT; In a message dated 9/26/2005 3:18:43 PM Central Standard Time, ctsvobodny@yahoo.com writes: That's the 5 foot rule(10 foot in G gauge), if they look good, go for it. So very true! But also with the t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-09/msg00147.html (10,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]