Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+Q\s+steam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+Q\s+steam\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: "John Trulson" <norskeviking@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:35:24 -0800; With all the new steam locomotives coming out in plastic, cheaper brass or cast metal/plastic, why is it most are larger locomotives? I know we have a K-2 4-6-0, but why not a K-4 (#919), P-6,P-6A 4-; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00004.html (10,000 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:44:16 -0500; John, I agree...but I would like to see the LARGEST Q steam, the 2-10-4! :) Cheers! Jan Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> To unsub; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00005.html (9,681 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: "TEB2771" <teb2771@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:51:39 -0600; This is a common problem in O Scale, too (where you need a gymnasium to turn the really big ones). Big Boys, Challengers and Northerns are common, but switchers and small locos hard to find. I have g; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00006.html (10,830 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:57:11 -0600; One way to generate manufacturer interest is to find "virtual copies" of what you want - in other words, find a locomotive that is nearly a duplicate. For instance, for the 2-10-4, the B&LE 2-10-4's; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00007.html (10,838 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: "Grice Dale-MGI1833" <dgrice@motorola.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:16:31 -0500; I would also suspect that there is a larger profit margin for the producer and retailer as you can get a larger price for a larger locomotive. Dale Grice ________________________________ One way to g; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00008.html (11,724 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:19:58 -0600; We have to blame ourselves..... that is what sells. While there is a lot of discussion about smaller locos being better suited to modest home layouts, the articulateds, Northerns, etc. continue to se; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00024.html (10,932 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:33:36 -0500; I've always assumed the main reason for the popularity of large engines is due to the ease of installing the motors and drives in the larger spaces. Small locos have very little room for what has to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00029.html (12,552 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:39:48 -0600; In the early days of HO and N this was a major concern, but no longer. For BLI it was a consideration but PCM has N Scale-Size sound boards and small locos are not a problem in HO and soon won't be i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00034.html (10,815 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] New Q steam (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:13:25 -0600; Yeah, I'm not sure how true this is anymore either. There are good running 4-4-0's in Sn3 (about the same size as an HO locomotive) that have boards and speakers. There are even N scale 4-4-0's - mor; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00036.html (12,838 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]