- 1. [CBQ] Leaker (score: 1)
- Author: qutlx1@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:57:42 EST
- Wonder why the AAR banned riveted tank cars from the rails? They leaked as they got older because the buff and draft, bouncing around and couplings would eventually loosen the rivets. One night while
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00200.html (9,850 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Leaker (score: 1)
- Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:36:57 EST
- Speaking of "leakers"...see it just keeps "pinging back and forth" I'm sure it happened at every mainline fuel rack, but I vividly recall than when I and a few..not railfans but willing to come along
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00201.html (10,816 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Leaker (score: 1)
- Author: Don Zinnecker <dzinnecker@juno.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:25:03 -0600
- What was the last date that riveted tank cars were allowed by the AAR to be used? Were they banned just for interchange to other railroads, or banned altogether? Could they be retained by the home ro
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00219.html (9,377 bytes)
- 4. RE: [CBQ] Leaker (score: 1)
- Author: "Grice Dale-MGI1833" <dgrice@motorola.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:41:00 -0500
- I know they can still be used in captive service. I know of one shortline that is using one for diesel fuel storage. They have an air operated pump on it to fuel their locos. Dale Dale Grice ________
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00220.html (10,483 bytes)
- 5. Fwd: [CBQ] Leaker (score: 1)
- Author: qutlx1@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:43:07 EST
- I could offer an experienced guess but since I'll be meeting with a person or two who are still working and were around when the riveted cars were banned I'll get a good date and advise. Give me a co
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00222.html (9,931 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu