Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+E\-5\s+wreck\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert Gamlen" <gamlenz@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 22:33:20 +0000
There is a series of undated photos on eBay of a collision involving F-3 #125A and an E-5, possibly near St Joseph. In photo #5, at the extreme left of the photo, a light-coloured &#8220;panel&#8221;
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00106.html (11,842 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:43:12 -0400
Rupert, The 994 would be one of the Havelock baggage cars. Dave --Original Message-- From: CBQ@groups.io [mailto:CBQ@groups.io]On Behalf Of Rupert Gamlen Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 6:33 PM To:
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00107.html (12,621 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Woodruff" <mwoodruff54@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:59:12 -0400
There is a series of undated photos on eBay of a collision involving F-3 #125A and an E-5, possibly near St Joseph. In photo #5, at the extreme left of the photo, a light-coloured panel labelled CB&
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00108.html (12,974 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Louis Zadnichek via Groups.Io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 23:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
October 27, 2018 MSW - You're correct, it's the 1960 head-on collision at Nodaway, MO. Brief details off the Internet: - - - - In December 1959, CTC was brought into service between St. Joseph and Na
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00109.html (21,570 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "jpslhedgpeth via Groups.Io" <jpslhedgpeth=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 03:11:30 +0000 (UTC)
Might this be the Head ender at Nodaway, MO in circa 1953..No. 23 NB hit train No. 70 in the siding at Nodaway. Pete Rupert, The 994 would be one of the Havelock baggage cars. Dave --Original Message
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00110.html (14,270 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "jpslhedgpeth via Groups.Io" <jpslhedgpeth=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 03:12:54 +0000 (UTC)
michael I wrote my "guess" as Nodaway before I saw your note..Might look it up on the ICC report Pete Probably the 1960 incident at Nodaway, MO: https://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/railway/trainord.htm#N
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00111.html (14,520 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 22:49:43 -0500
Pete Probably the 1960 incident at Nodaway, MO: https://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/railway/trainord.htm#Noda msw largofl On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 6:33 PM Rupert Gamlen <gamlenz@hotmail.com> wrote: There
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00112.html (15,390 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert Gamlen" <gamlenz@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 06:38:13 +0000
Dave, Michael, Louis etc. Thanks for the identification of the &#8220;panel&#8221;. Looking at a photo of a Havelock baggage car, I can see where it came from. Thanks also for identifying the wreck.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00113.html (14,992 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:08:22 -0700
Did the CB&Q rulebook have a 20mph speed limit for Reduced Speed? When I came to Alliance and Sheridan in 1974-75 on BN, Reduced Speed had no speed limit associated with it. That was the primary diff
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00114.html (11,350 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:08:22 -0700
[Edited Message Follows] Did the CB&Q rulebook have a 20mph speed limit for Reduced Speed? When I came to Alliance and Sheridan in 1974-75 on BN, Reduced Speed had no speed limit associated with it.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00115.html (11,581 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:08:22 -0700
[Edited Message Follows] Did the CB&Q rulebook have a 20mph speed limit for Reduced Speed? When I came to Alliance and Sheridan in 1974-75 on BN, Reduced Speed had no speed limit associated with it.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00116.html (11,690 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:08:22 -0700
[Edited Message Follows] Did the CB&Q rulebook have a 20mph speed limit for Reduced Speed? When I came to Alliance and Sheridan in 1974-75 on BN, Reduced Speed had no speed limit associated with it.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00117.html (11,184 bytes)

13. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Scott" <wscott@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 10:11:25 -0700
The damage to the E-5 seems to indicate that one train, or both, was/were going more than 20 mph. Does anyone have a picture of the damage done when two trains actually collide at 20 mph? Just wonder
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00118.html (11,130 bytes)

14. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Louis Zadnichek via Groups.Io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC)
October 28, 2018 Group - Scroll down to page 26 in the following link: https://books.google.com/books?id=FT47AAAAMAAJ&pg=PP9&lpg=PP9&dq=Nodaway+Missouri+August+22,+1960+Train+Wreck&source=bl&ots=ETVd
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00119.html (16,735 bytes)

15. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:20:25 -0700
In my 41 years as an engineer I saw lots of photos of collisions at speeds under 20mph that resulted in terrific damage. Locos on top of one another, cars jacknifed and on top of one another. It all
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00120.html (13,616 bytes)

16. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 16:01:53 -0700
If you don't believe that low speed collisions can cause terrific destruction here are some pics of the March 1971 collision at Sheridan yard where Second -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00121.html (12,085 bytes)

17. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Hennessey" <4huskers@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:15:14 -0500
I saw the 5701 sitting on two flats (cut in two)in the Livingston yard August, 1971.  Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Winton Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 6:01 PM To: CBQ@groups.io Subject: Re:
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00122.html (12,463 bytes)

18. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "William Hirt" <whirt@fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:01:21 -0500
The Burlington Lines rulebook effective May 1, 1951 states: "RESTRICTED SPEED - Proceed prepared to stop short of train, obstruction, or switch not properly lined and to look out for broken rail. RED
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00123.html (14,790 bytes)

19. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "jpslhedgpeth via Groups.Io" <jpslhedgpeth=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
Bill et al..trivia technicality...This part of the old St. Joe Division was at the time of this affair actually CTC. It had formerly been double track abs..I can't recall the Number of the rule(s) th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00124.html (16,536 bytes)

20. Re: [CBQ] E-5 wreck (score: 1)
Author: "William Hirt" <whirt@fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:22:04 -0500
Pete, Thanks for the correction. I am enjoying the DVD I bought from you at the fall meet. The Lincoln folks and you did a great job. Bill Hirt On 10/29/2018 9:43 AM, jpslhedgpeth via Groups.Io wrote
/archives/BRHSLIST/2018-10/msg00125.html (19,145 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu