Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Courtesy\s+\&\s+Toloerence\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Courtesy\s+\&\s+Toloerence\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:15:02 -0500; Hi All, I've been thinking about the direction the Track Oiling (speeder vs motor car) thread went, and I, like some others on the list who have emailed me directly, am concerned. I understand the de; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00133.html (14,551 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:04:03 +0000; Hi All, I've been thinking about the direction the Track Oiling (speeder vs motor car) thread went, and I, like some others on the list who have emailed me directly, am concerned. I understand the d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00136.html (16,119 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:16:48 +0000; Hi All, I've been thinking about the direction the Track Oiling (speeder vs motor car) thread went, and I, like some others on the list who have emailed me directly, am concerned. I understand the d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00137.html (15,485 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:15:23 -0500; I do not beleive that any of the posts were intended to be negative, and for the most part this was a healthy discussion. However, there were some who interpreted the posts as being negative and as t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00138.html (14,335 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: "Harold Huber" <sarge9@bresnan.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:18:49 -0700; All, Dave is dead on this is getting old and crusty, I am in this hobby to have fun not to berate others because they do not speak the same way as you do DROP IT!!!!!!!! Harold Huber --Original Messa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00139.html (15,189 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: RWA325@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:54:26 -0500 (EST); I've been a member of the model railroading and railfan communities for fifty years and have never worked for a railroad. I have no problem with being identified with and/or labeled as a member of th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00140.html (14,965 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: <bdurham260@yahoo.com>; Date: 14 Jan 2014 15:52:33 -0800; One thing to keep in mind is that some people, me for one, were born after the BN merger and never had the chance to be a part of the living railroad. Somehow though I found the Q and it is very spec; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00148.html (11,372 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: "Robert McNay" <CptMatt@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:23:45 -0600; Sadly, this seems to not be limited to railfans, but almost anything rail related. Ai have encountered it a lot in model railroading circles too. Rob McNay Chicago IL From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mail; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00151.html (14,435 bytes)
9. RE: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence (score: 1): Author: Anthony Nunziata <anunziata1776@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:55:36 -0500; I agree. You would think that the newbies would be treated like Marilyn Monroe of their time. To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com From: CptMatt@ameritech.net Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:23:45 -0600 Subject: RE: [C; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00162.html (14,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]