BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence

To: "CBQ yahoo" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence
From: dhartman@mchsi.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:16:48 +0000
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1389716189; bh=5l1+4jTJbtnhq2yVrgYPiSXw6XUzr/69hQyNiZ6phAg=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=g6g93hjTMZqM+yDqkb4AcEQOWeRCeP8xZ2SeIFbwCIZ81AbIv2E0cKRtU1F7Y/WhFLbMJhfLpwYH3wBN/oDDbjfGj4HUeBi3SJUtqVwrsGjEVVuqu5TNRmbcIja5WdeGOX8tGCa7ctLASQrqMkWinkz1zw+D++8VGvuBtSaOEBE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=qDnMcxDTwTwmpE3QeQvmMe2omFhwRo+2PkMkVm7g0hiS5krvxXZLM4mPtkwLRh6Js9TGhgvYNYxaeTQmqHBHL4ib9wB8V95PmdYsRWNDe9mlIJV+YyrvYrrrhZDCu0fDv0MT4j+GzhzRYWBNmZYfwn5vIYaBXEfU3EogzmycmOY=;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <KGEBKGPLHMDMEJMKKJGOGEKONBAA.dave_lotz@bellsouth.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <BAY173-W33F6CDAC598027389804BECABC0@phx.gbl> <KGEBKGPLHMDMEJMKKJGOGEKONBAA.dave_lotz@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sensitivity: Normal


Condescending, not condensation :) although of course I may be all wet
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

From: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:15:02 -0500
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Courtesy & Toloerence

 

Hi All,
 
I've been thinking about the direction the Track Oiling (speeder vs motor car) thread went, and I, like some others on the list who have emailed me directly, am concerned.  I understand the desire for accurate terminology when it comes to recording historical railroading, but, there are several terms that "modern" modelers & railfans have coined to describe, clarify, differentiate pieces if equipment, paint schemes, etc.  Some of these terms have come from other railroads, for example the term "speeder" was used on the old Frisco and possibly others.   I have always strived to keep the CBQ list a place that is "safe" for discussions and sharing interest in the CB&Q for old heads as well as modelers and railfans who are trying to learn about "real" railroading.  One groups is no better, or worse than the other...we all have our preferences, but to negatively call out a person, or a group of people for using a term that may not be 100% historically accurate for the Q, is not a behavior I want to see perpetuated on this list.  Courtesy, tolerence and politely offering correcting is accepted.
 
Best regards,
 
Dave Lotz
CBQ List Owner



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>