- 1. [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Gortowski via groups.io" <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:09:43 +0000 (UTC)
- Steve, Rich Gortowski here. We're looking at putting in signals for the Steward to Oregon layout (in 1950) that I'm building. After a planning session, we came up with a bunch of questions on how the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00062.html (12,294 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Gortowski via groups.io" <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:11:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Sorry, list. This was meant for Steve Holding. Steve, Rich Gortowski here. We're looking at putting in signals for the Steward to Oregon layout (in 1950) that I'm building. After a planning session,
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00063.html (12,640 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Joel McCurry via groups.io" <mtnsouth=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:38:03 +0000 (UTC)
- Rich and Steve, Sounds like an interesting topic to a lot of us. Maybe someothers would have some inout too. Joel McCurry Sorry, list. This was meant for Steve Holding. --Original Message-- From: Ric
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00075.html (13,685 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "o_rrman" <mofferman@ameritech.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 07:33:08 -0800
- I agree Joel. I could learn from that topic. Mike Offerman _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64757) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00085.html (10,420 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Mack via groups.io" <thommack=yahoo.com@groups.io>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:25:59 -0800
- _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64802) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group O
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00130.html (11,676 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:52:43 +0000
- Tom: I did not see the signal diagram that was posted. The signals that you indicated have three heads are actually 3 color light signals at intermediate signal locations. I believe all of the interm
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00133.html (17,556 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:53:07 +0000
- Tom: I did not see the signal diagram that was posted. The signals that you indicated have three heads are actually 3 color light signals at intermediate signal locations. I believe all of the interm
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00134.html (16,778 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 13:36:02 -0800
- If you look closely at the diagram the small bottom 'lights' that _on_ the signal pole are actually square fixed signs to indicate this is a Permissive signal. The small bottom lights that are _offse
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00136.html (10,773 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 13:36:02 -0800
- [Edited Message Follows] If you look closely at the diagram the small bottom 'lights' that are mounted _on_ the signal pole are actually square fixed signs to indicate this is a Permissive signal. Th
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00137.html (10,581 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Gortowski via groups.io" <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 02:56:58 +0000 (UTC)
- Rich G Rich and Group, Thanks for posting the C&I Signal Diagram. One thing I found very interesting and wonder if it changed by the 60's. The diagram shows most of the signals on the single track p
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2022-12/msg00138.html (13,811 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu