To: | "CBQ@groups.io" <CBQ@groups.io> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram |
From: | "Richard Gortowski via groups.io" <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Dec 2022 02:56:58 +0000 (UTC) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@groups.io |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1672023420; bh=Kn6Y40wBreaRSkio9wB6FLut8SRnLpEW75tQVkCHFTA=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=jx8y42PWgsw0Wd2xwk80k0fWvzZ2SJIVxd02vt7g6Bja7onZqW9EGLnlLrb/VFYjPha upz/Cf9JKSPGRyv31GpcyefUKGozWodiLglyjFS5FjhWmDD4tdtUXi58OWonR7xsz4G4q 4WymAFWwUaPH9BVoISFzZESeUuvKu2pXgGQ= |
In-reply-to: | <24265.1671902759695693658@groups.io> |
List-help: | <mailto:CBQ+help@groups.io> |
List-id: | <CBQ.groups.io> |
List-subscribe: | <mailto:CBQ+subscribe@groups.io> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ+unsubscribe@groups.io> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io |
References: | <206661628.190270.1670944185573@mail.yahoo.com> <24265.1671902759695693658@groups.io> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@groups.io |
Sender: | CBQ@groups.io |
To set the record straight, this Signal diagram. plus articles on the C&I CTC were provided by Brandon Otterstrom on the CB&Q IO Group in response to questions I posed. He sent this May 3rd on message 63676 for those of you looking for the original.
https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/63676 Rich G
Rich and Group,
Thanks for posting the C&I Signal Diagram. One thing I found very interesting and wonder if it changed by the 60's. The diagram shows most of the signals on the single track portions as having three signal heads. I can't recall seeing photos of any three signal head signals along the C&I. I went to the CB&Q signal diagrams document I have, as well as the 1967 Consolidated Rules book, and it appears that the bottom (third) signal would give indication for restricting while the second down (center signal in a three signal setup) would define the diverging route aspect. Since there was only one signal between each of the signal controlled sidings did the Q use a three searchlight signal to add restricting or what is the diagram wrong in showing three light signals? Second, it appears that a number of southbound signals show a small offset lunar(?) to the bottom right. The Consolidated Code book of 1967 doesn't show any signals with a lunar at the bottom right. What is this for? (An example of one of these southbound signals is shown below signal N110.7 just north of Stratford.) -- Tom Mack Cincinnati, OH _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64809) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic _._,_._,_
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram, Winton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] Westbound Signal At Oregon, IL, Tom Mack via groups.io |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram, zephyr98072 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] C & I Diagram, Richard Gortowski via groups.io |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |