Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Union\s+History\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Union\s+History\s+Question\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Union History Question (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 08:05:53 -0800 (PST); Leo On the Q, yardmen were represented by the BRT, all along. The "snakes", SUNA never did represnt them. On the Beardstown Division, at least, they were in the same Lodges as the roadmen, but had di; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00080.html (9,080 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Union History Question (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:47:01 -0800 (PST); Leo I don't when the BRT got the yardmen, system-wide, but I have a 1952 working agreement with BRT as representive of the yardmen, including the C&A Division yards. I have a 1910 letter, in which th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00088.html (8,377 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Union History Question (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:01:37 -0800 (PST); Leo There may be a little crook to this thing. As you know, the membership in a Brotherhood was not always the same as who was the Bargaining Agent. On this part the railroad, most conductors did not; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00089.html (8,132 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Union History Question (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 21:03:40 -0800 (PST); Leo I have an old engineer's roster, marked up by the local chairman. It has the letters "E", "F", "DH" or "NB", beside each name. "E" was BLE, "F" was BLF&E, "DH" was double header or membership in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00090.html (8,671 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Union History Question (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 14:49:59 -0800 (PST); Leo After the 1953 Union Shop Agreement, there weren't any "no bills". If you didn't join, you lost your seniority! And by the way, before that, the greivers were required by Federal Law, to give all; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00107.html (7,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]