Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Stingy\s+or\s+not\s+Stingy\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Stingy\s+or\s+not\s+Stingy\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:47:07 -0700 (PDT); I thought an opinion from the younger generation might be in order here. I am 18 years old and about to begin college. I've only been able to work for 2 summers, so I don't have a lot of spending mon; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00006.html (16,635 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: "zephyr9903" <zephyr9903@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:48:28 -0600; Thank you, Bryan. It would be good to understand the CB&Q's attraction for a modeler born 15 years after it ceased to exist. If we old f**ts don't understand your view, we wont be able to ensure that; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00008.html (13,086 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: "Florian Griessenboeck" <florian@voldoepperwirt.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 18:36:59 +0200; Dear Gentlemen, The discussion about the expensiveness of Q stuff is quite a good example for the real value of the prototype. At least to me it is an overwhelming feeling of accomplishment when I fi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00018.html (11,244 bytes)
4. [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 09:28:37 -0700; About the stinginess of Burlington fans, I remain agnostic. Certainly not true in my own case. About the "frugality" of the prototype, I think the tight fist was only part of the story. The other par; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00019.html (9,256 bytes)
5. [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: "nycbqfan" <jsauer@estee.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:39:41 -0600; For my two cents on this subject: 1. Actually, my opinion of late (after being in this hobby 35 years) is that we have more great stuff in CB&Q than ever. I can't ever remember being in a position wh; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-07/msg00270.html (15,248 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: "Gregory Myers" <myers.gregory@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:39:59 -0400; For my two cents on this subject: 1. Actually, my opinion of late (after being in this hobby 35 years) is that we have more great stuff in CB&Q than ever. I can't ever remember being in a position wh; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-07/msg00271.html (15,528 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Stingy or not Stingy? (score: 1): Author: "zephyr9903" <zephyr9903@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:45:21 -0600; And Marshall reples, <You make some good points, but I'd like to expand a bit on some . . . I'll insert my comments at the appropriate spots, framed <thusly> <True, but I also think it would be good; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-07/msg00272.html (13,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]