Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+FW\:\s+Genesis\s+CB\&Q\s+2\-8\-2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+FW\:\s+Genesis\s+CB\&Q\s+2\-8\-2\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:32:22 EST; Many CB&Q loclomotives had white heralds and numbers. Not all were gold. It was common to see O1a's with white paint. O1a's (4900s, 5000s and 5100s) were light mikes. 03s were heavies. (I believe O2s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00209.html (6,546 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Barrett" <barrett@g...>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:52:24 -0600; Go for it Ed, I agree with you there is nothing wrong with the Athearn engines, I turned away from the Genesis Mike because wan't satisfied with the looks of it and being patient one will probably co; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00211.html (12,784 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: "Florian Griessenboeck" <florian@v...>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 20:57:38 +0900; There's nothing wrong with the Athearn Mikado. That's right. But the equipment becomes better and better and it's the quality makers who are having success. When I look at the model marked here in Eu; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00212.html (9,051 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Barrett" <barrett@g...>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:08:56 -0600; I agree there is nothing wrong with raising the standard, I could easily afford 3 or 4 engines of High Tech quality if I wanted to by buying from discount houses, but the thing what concerns me is th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00213.html (11,091 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: "Florian Griessenboeck" <florian@v...>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:08:47 +0900; Tom, I don't say you are wrong. No, I like the way you're doing things because you have a lot of fun and at last that's what counts. I think there will be always a basic line, at least to introduce n; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00216.html (11,313 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Barrett" <barrett@g...>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:45:58 -0600; Florian I agree with what you just said, there should always be a basic line of dependable products such as the Athearn standard designs with the options to go more advanced with the high tech line,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00217.html (13,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]