Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Question\s+Re\s+Chicago\s+Union\s+Station\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@p...>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 15:01:41 -0600
Pennsylvania RR Chicago, Burlington and Quincy RR Alton RR (Gulf, Mobile and Ohio RR after 1948). Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific RR. (Note: the Union Pacific Railroad, at this time, was usi
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00116.html (6,934 bytes)

2. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: JACKGP20@a...
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:47:56 EST
The Union Pacific Railroad never used C&NW Terminal in Chicago during the 40's. The trains were C&NW. UP ran to Omaha, C&NW picked up their trains to Chicago. Unlike the CB&Q- D&RGW-WP California Zep
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00117.html (8,188 bytes)

3. RE: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "John N Shankland" <jns@i...>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:15:49 -0600
What does the term "Union" Station mean? There was a Union Station in almost every big town? John S
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00118.html (8,165 bytes)

4. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: <metcalf@a...>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:26:35 -0700
You've raised an interesting question. Union Stations occurred when two or more railroads joined together with a common station. There were (and still are) depots that are joint facilities of two or
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00119.html (8,861 bytes)

5. RE: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "John N Shankland" <jns@i...>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:50:20 -0600
Interesting that they all picked the same name, or that it was allowed. The ??/?? railroads were allowed to name their place Union Station in Cincinnati for example. You would think that who ever ha
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00120.html (9,477 bytes)

6. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: rgortowski@a...
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 20:51:04 EST
Chicago Union Station Company owned and operated CUS. The owners of the CUSC were Pennsylvania Railroad (50%) Chicago, Burlington and Quincy (25%) and Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific (25%).
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00122.html (9,186 bytes)

7. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: <metcalf@a...>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:44:20 -0700
I don't know of any examples of just Union Station. There's Denver Union Station (owned and operated by the Denver Union Terminal Co.), Chicago Union Station, Salina Union Depot in Kansas, Pueblo Uni
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00123.html (10,334 bytes)

8. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@p...>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 22:16:55 -0600
Jack On rereading my original reply, you are indeed correct. UP Trains, operated by the Chicago and Northwestern RR, used the CN&W station; UP Railroad operations did not go into Chicago. Should have
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00127.html (9,169 bytes)

9. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@p...>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 22:21:31 -0600
John Union Stations, as with many other stations, were often jointly owned by multiple railroads, usually through a separate corporation that controlled both the terminal and, sometimes, railroad ope
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00128.html (9,962 bytes)

10. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: JACKGP20@a...
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 05:09:54 EST
Some Union Stations weren't called Union Stations. Chicago's Dearborn Station was owned by the Chicago and Western Indiana, a terminal and marginal commuter road. This road was owned jointly by stati
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00129.html (8,021 bytes)

11. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 08:44:30 -0600 (CST)
"Union Station" is a generic name, and means it serves more than one railroad, that is, that they have "united" to operate out of one station. Perhaps one of the most noted examples at one time was t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00130.html (12,058 bytes)

12. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: BNJohn@a...
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:40:39 EST
Wes, I guess you haven't been to St.Louis lately, the TRRA hasn't had extensive freight operations since the late 70's to mid 80's. They actually do very little switching in St.Louis at all, and what
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00136.html (8,800 bytes)

13. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "Ed & Betty Padgett" <epadgett@p...>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:20:53 -0600
As I recall from my Dad and Mr. Murphy (when I asked), in Chicago, it was for the Union Terminal Company. The railroads did not directly own or operate the station. Don't have any idea of what they d
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00141.html (8,684 bytes)

14. Re: [BRHSlist] Question Re Chicago Union Station (score: 1)
Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 17:06:44 -0600
Even in smaller towns. All "Union Station" meant was that the building served more than one railroad. The station in Burlington, IA was known as a "Union Station" because it served the CB&Q and Rock
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00246.html (8,907 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu