Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Brass\s+2\-6\-2\s+R1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Brass\s+2\-6\-2\s+R1\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: Schultz Terry-QA2088 <qa2088@motorola.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:51:20 -0500; Ken, Jonathan, John, Bob, John, etc Thanks to all who contributed to my question about the R1. I really appreciate the vast amount of knowledge and willingness to help. Terry -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-06/msg00014.html (7,948 bytes)
2. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: "Bob's Engine House" <bobsenginehouse@m...>; Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 16:40:48 -0500; Terry, I have one of the engines setting in a box. It is a very nice engine but I have not run it. I would suspect that it would take some lubrication to get it ready to run. I haven't disassembled t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00066.html (7,916 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 18:08:41 -0700; Terry, I have an R-1 I bought when they came out. They seemed to sneak in as there wasn't much hoopla about them. Mine sat in a box for a long time before I painted it and even yet I have not run it; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00068.html (7,677 bytes)
4. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: Schultz Terry-QA2088 <qa2088@m...>; Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:14:51 -0500; Ken Thanks for your response. I think I'll try to find one of these. Terry Terry, I have an R-1 I bought when they came out. They seemed to sneak in as there wasn't much hoopla about them. Mine sat i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00073.html (8,403 bytes)
5. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 21:35:30 -0700; Terry -- Thing to keep in mind about the R1 is that it was an early ... you might even say a transitional or experimental ... engine. Historically important and apparently quite successful, but (like; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00099.html (9,603 bytes)
6. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:11:58 -0700 (PDT); Jonathan An old timer (fireman/engineer), told me that the R-2's with their frame configuration, were very hard on track with light rails. The trailer truck was rigid and didn't swivel. John -- jonat; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00101.html (11,276 bytes)
7. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 15:46:11 -0700; John -- Very interesting point. I recall being surprised at first when I got my NPP R1 and discovered that the trailing truck didn't swivel (although there's some play, which I guess helps). Then I f; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00103.html (8,781 bytes)
8. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:55:00 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00104.html (10,052 bytes)
9. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: railbass@a...; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:34:40 +0000; Jonathan - Since I model the late 1940s and early 1950s, how difficult would it be to kitbash an NPP R1 2-6-2 to an R2 2-6-2 surviving into this time period? - John Manion Denver, CO railbass@a...; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00147.html (10,630 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:43:12 -0700; John, I think you would have some trouble. The R-2 is about 6ft longer than the R-1,and it has a different cab, are the first things that I see. You can look at the folio sheets on Becks site at: htt; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00149.html (7,822 bytes)
11. RE: [BRHSlist] Brass 2-6-2 R1 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:38:34 -0700; John -- Besides the differences Ken mentions are the R-2's fatter, straight-top boiler (vs. the R-1's tapered boiler), larger tender, different dome positions, etc. Note also that no R-2s survived pa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00151.html (8,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]