Re: [CBQ] E5 Questions

["Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>]

Dennis,

 

We are looking for definitive proof for the West Burlington Shops since the shot welding process would have been required.

Dave

 

From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> On Behalf Of Dennis Popish via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019 12:22 PM
To: CBQ@groups.io
Cc: BRHSList@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] E5 Questions

 

Dave:

 

To the second question, since stainless steel diesels and passenger cars were being maintained by their own forces since 1934 why would their diesel and car shops not be able to maintain the E-5’s as part of their normal fleet maintenance operations?

 

Thanks- Dennis Popish

On Jul 5, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Dave Lotz <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Of course, now that the “definitive” work on the E5s has been printed, there are a couple of questions that have arisen.

 

The first is what was the reason (or reasons) for the Burlington removing the names from the E5 locomotives.  If anyone has a definitive answer, please share it.  There are a couple of theories, but nothing definitive.  We know that when this was done, they simply flipped the name plates placing blank side out.

 

The second is when E5 body repairs were needed, did the West Burlington Shops have the shot welding equipment to do this, or did they have Budd representatives come and do the work?   The other possible scenarios would be to have the units sent to Aurora, but did Aurora have the shot welding equipment, or did they have Budd representatives come and do the work?

 

Inquiring minds want to know.

 

Dave Lotz

 

Virus-free. www.avast.com

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#57618) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_