|
I just did..read your mail. Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: 'John D. Mitchell, Jr.' cbqrr47@yahoo.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thu, Dec 31, 2015 9:58 am Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Grain Haulage Pete
Tell him how claims worked.
John
From: "Kirby Lambert kirby@prospectortech.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:55 AM Subject: [CBQ] Re: Grain Haulage Relative to my previous message (see below) I know that livestock shippers had to absorb the "shrinkage" caused by injury, death or weight loss. What was the case with other volatile freight?
Kirby Lambert
Previous message:
Many have talked about the frequency of leakage.
That leakage would have changed the delivered quantity/weight.
Who got stuck with the revenue loss caused by the leakage, the shipper, the consignee or the RR?
Kirby Lambert
__._,_.___ Posted by: jpslhedgpeth@aol.com __,_._,___ |