To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? |
From: | "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
Date: | 26 Oct 2015 08:39:21 -0700 |
Authentication-results: | mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=yahoogroups.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoogroups.com; dkim=pass (ok) |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1445873963; bh=6lm/r6ABT5WyZqzG4eKsmh+COqN/3dZ1rzUc/CRSDbA=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=TxYjbBPEsKnn1pV8bxZlm42w6Yh3QjiHNESdZySXlb8IJUeFZS2bTvfCIJ8kBkI49nUBO4Rjm6kiidi+sizOoMT9z2R9Vr2eViJ3hVmWqSGnw4jtC2j38rKVC79INPWLxpeSBlGDNaAvVEUqTEjgGEr7+gSxTCyn/FUTIzHpKHA= |
In-reply-to: | <3368eb.d979a56.4343f81d@aol.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <3368eb.d979a56.4343f81d@aol.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Responding to an older post when we were talking about hypothetical Q steam Louis wrote, October 5, 2015 Mike and Rupert - I believe that Charlie Vlk might be able to tell us more,
but it's my understanding that a NYC 4-6-4 demonstrated on the Q during the time
period the Super Hudson S-4-A's were being designed. However, I've never seen
any photos of a NYC 4-6-4 powering Q passenger trains of the era. Has anyone
else? If this actually happened, then imagine how an ALCO
NYC Hudson would've appeared as a Q passenger locomotive..... Mike, you have a
vivid imagination. I like that! Best Regards - Louis Louis Zadnichek II
And now I write... this is quite interesting that the Q may have been interested in a Super Hudson of some sort. Around 1937 or so ALCO built the C&NW E4s and Milwaukee Road F7s both with 84" drivers while Baldwin built the #3460 class Hudsons for the Santa Fe with the same size drivers. One might think that the Q would have been a candidate for the 84" driver club Hudsons but they had already gone whole hog for diesels. The C&NW Hudsons weren't used on the 400s though. They were for the mainline UP / CNW trains to Omaha and I don't think they were used on the 400s. If the Burlington would have had Baldwin construct a Super Hudson what would it have looked like. Utilitarian like a Santa Fe Hudson or streamlined or ? I think a plausible and cheap model could be made using an old PFM Tenshodo Santa Fe Hudson and then put some sort of coal tender behind it. I kind of think the box styling Santa Fe used might have been too extreme for the Burlington so they would have done something different. If it was streamlined would the Q have tried to have gotten a Dreyfuss or Kuhler to style like NYC and Milwaukee or just stuck with stainless steel and designed it along the lines of the Aeoli (my plural for the Alice twins). I could see the Q maybe buying a class of six Super Hudsons from Baldwin. You have to kind of figure that the thing would be stainless... unless the Q went bonkers like the Santa Fe and painted it blue. And I've not ever seen any explanation for why the #3460 was blue. In this thread the USRA heavy pacific was mentioned as a forerunner of the #3000s as well as the Southern Railway Ps-4 Pacifics like #1401 in the Smithsonian. I've thought for a very long time that a really cool hypothetical engine for the Q would be a PFM Ps-4. Take the walkway off of the tender, replace the trailing truck with a Delta, get rid of the flutes on the stack and BANGO you've got a Q heavy Pacific. It even has an Elesco on the smokebox. The only thing not plausible is the Southern 4-6-2s drivers are only like 73" or so. Q would have had 78s at least but if you use it for a dual use engine 73" would work. More nutball thoughts, Mike Martin __._,_.___ Posted by: atsf3460@frontier.com __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Q Steam Being Scrapped At NWS&W, Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam?, atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ] |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam?, 'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ] |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam?, atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ] |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |