To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Videos |
From: | "drsager2@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
Date: | 25 Sep 2015 09:18:56 -0700 |
Authentication-results: | mta1005.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=yahoogroups.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoogroups.com; dkim=pass (ok) |
Authentication-results: | mta1005.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=yahoogroups.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoogroups.com; dkim=pass (ok) |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1443198576; bh=Hj0W8E2oWS0DYYWPjZTMLPWgbhyYShKHm+hrDurvErY=; h=Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:From:Subject; b=eb632cLbRkD3CFKoUDbIEVnh/OXlTertP2Zk2W+jsffCTi8ONsVTmndu9egfHjcAfvRWlGO1F1mQ/hpnsb0E442nC9SnxOHHoiANXJYGSfRuiYvJL5rz0G2ubwzu2OyLCBqmMSaVKxSgiB4K7MH33lli7DpLeH+BXkvvIrlwqW0= |
In-reply-to: | <14fffd762dd-10fc-c4c@webprd-m41.mail.aol.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <157FDFE6-2C2E-4AA2-9089-3FF188555415@gmail.com> <14fffd762dd-10fc-c4c@webprd-m41.mail.aol.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
I may be late to the party, but since I just re-watched the video last night I thought I'd bring this up... During the D&RGW section of the film they point out a meet of an eastbound and westbound CZ, so we know at least the D&RGW had multiple trainsets. Seeing as how the CB&Q portion of the route was more than a 12-hour trip, would it not be probable that there were actually 2 (or more) consists? Since there was only 1 F3 ABA set, there had to be something else pulling the trains. Even if they changed power somewhere along the route so that the F3 lash-up could stay on the western side, there still had to be other locos pulling the CZ. According to the 1950 CZ timetable, departure from Chicago was at 3:30pm. The train arrived in Denver at 8:20am the following morning, all being handled by the CB&Q. The eastbound left Denver at 7:15pm and arrived in Chicago at 1:30pm the next day (again, all Burlington). It would be impossible for the same units arriving in Denver at 8 in the morning to make it back to Chicago for that day's afternoon departure. With a daily schedule, the CB&Q must have had at least one more consist to handle the "every other day" turnaround in the timetable. Am I missing something?
__._,_.___ Posted by: drsager2@yahoo.com __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] RPO's video, STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Videos, Jim's Junction trains28@bresnan.net [CBQ] |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Videos, rgortowski@aol.com [CBQ] |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Videos, Jim's Junction trains28@bresnan.net [CBQ] |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |