BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: GN power on the Q

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: GN power on the Q
From: dhartman@mchsi.com
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 13:59:15 +0000
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1336053529; bh=RwmI3E5cHdm6pG1JYYcO7+WzfEXfTiaSBAqUHtTw4Us=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=eVBrC4rVywNDtnfYClE8GiHpdbN6hSSEN/1XdINOU4fMA2EHqzaB/xlqWao6PRpuHMBa6bb0kIhoTtxoXtnvRoPqvvnOb6mSlXuzYEYIfh+URsrUtFg4WsIDLLMySt01
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=jOzCFTkfL9t+AXXp9WjQeyoVqWESinPySOnqndsv0Qny1NqUkUklm+/Pi0EjZdSZGW1BR7eKnD0DOxKUnJvGaNSq3SCSTG7gDqDh3XYqoAm+6EbRow2ZRjreOMVOaMkk;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1336051468.1834.YahooMailNeo@web112018.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <1336051468.1834.YahooMailNeo@web112018.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sensitivity: Normal


Ah yes. Thinking you stood for #4 and getting 97 instead.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

From: Karl Rethwisch <qrailroadman@yahoo.com>
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 06:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com<CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: GN power on the Q [1 Attachment]

 

Ahhh, 97 !!!  What memories !!  Bill's shot is from the pre-merger days of 97 and 88 when GN "power" was being used as the mileage equalization units for the Q E units used in passenger service.  This unit configuration was "normal" on 97 and 88.  My shot, at the east end of Big Rock, was the post-merger use of the now combined fleet and no longer confined to the 97/88 trains.
 
Horrible stuff !!!!
 
Karl



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>