Re: [CBQ] train number question

To:	CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject:	Re: [CBQ] train number question
From:	Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:36:18 -0800
Delivered-to:	unknown
Delivered-to:	archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to:	mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1323974377; bh=05OTfr5mMwL/kJfeNCd8v5K8OKGs0fL5a5DQvcaXkiY=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-RC-FROM:X-RC-RCPT:X-Received:X-Priority:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=RzDv4kHFqLtdFojCsnH5VILCXP/XHmZJBJJ9mSmfwWi1rXfsymFZqxBfkg88Sign/ntSGCREYAhAUFtEeuhukrFhjiDlCbgBg320gcqzQcNddBes+ATRMtoGI5dT8AAm
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=RXMWm2Bqcxot/c+uSuKNWKQEMHCKFsXysOfeWjiOz1Pof2fymi1I5/7++3znCr7BTg4V5rOZB0Uil7hg4SOaL6+EEEKhcTj0JAKCzuT7oA/u4sZTwbmcXYSuJ/Hg5vQv;
In-reply-to:	<BLU0-SMTP10C2D2B42FF8B47272D67782A30@phx.gbl>
List-id:	<CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe:	<mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list:	list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References:	<KGEBKGPLHMDMEJMKKJGOKEILKKAA.dave_lotz@bellsouth.net> <BLU0-SMTP10C2D2B42FF8B47272D67782A30@phx.gbl>
Reply-to:	CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender:	CBQ@yahoogroups.com

Duncen,

Dorin's "Everywhere West The Burlington Route" p32 has a picture of train #110 using 9816 headed for Quincy via Carthage in 1952.

9815 - 9818 were imported in brass some years ago.

Ken Martin

On Dec 15, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Duncan Cameron wrote:

Thanks Dave and John. It would be the Burlington to Quincy train I was thinking of. I'd seen a picture of a motorcar in Burlington that was presented as train #43 (which could have been, but certainly wasn't typical). I then thought that maybe the Illinois-side train had the same number, being in another division. So I'm left assuming that, at least on one occasion #9849, was used on train #43.
Thanks again.
Duncan

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[CBQ] train number question, Duncan Cameron Re: [CBQ] train number question, John D. Mitchell, Jr. RE: [CBQ] train number question, Dave Lotz Re: [CBQ] train number question, John D. Mitchell, Jr. Re: [CBQ] train number question, Duncan Cameron Re: [CBQ] train number question, Kenneth Martin <= Re: [CBQ] train number question, Duncan Cameron Re: [CBQ] train number question, Larry Stoll Re: [CBQ] train number question, Duncan Cameron

Previous by Date:	Re: [CBQ] Standard Waycar Equipment, sartherdj@aol.com
Next by Date:	Re: [CBQ] Standard Waycar Equipment, sartherdj@aol.com
Previous by Thread:	Re: [CBQ] train number question, Duncan Cameron
Next by Thread:	Re: [CBQ] train number question, Duncan Cameron
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]