BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: Railroad Fact

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: Railroad Fact
From: "apo09324" <apo09324@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 02:44:57 -0000
Delivered-to: archives@venus.nauer.org
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1299984306; bh=m7FdIyD9J5vzEvq6FSsT5t9IlHjM0xtiT1Un/pfbIN8=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=c8cldcZsrueuWmCkM7YIGi6O4L44gATTEYzGX0WVhhZBfagLuzr2hdwiUepLvSFlWsRbgxsTQWUiEdMtWtnxCk/yEE+KL4QIZANNbSr1kdUJyr4+uTjDHsZjHWVrXamH
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=lxeD24vWuFG5rg8IVKnp+5QdVYmnIxVUiFn71WXuThIKXbyA2EY9rF7joWRWqNJv4kJc1OxhfS4i/6/VfZ6whJU0WNF8l5wdnbVtoyck4fIytSEoPQ0q9cyn78ZZ9G/1;
In-reply-to: <C9981F83.9F1E%almondj@comcast.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Crane's Pond in Mount Pleasant, Iowa, now a city park.  There is another lake 
north of New London, Iowa now owned by a country club, but I don't know the 
name.

Ken Vandevoort

--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, John Almond <almondj@...> wrote:
>
> Can you provide some examples of lakes owned by railroads?  I never gave it
> a thought, thinking that most water came from wells they owned or rivers
> openly available.
> 
> I can understand it as a tender¹s water capacity was greater by volume than
> 50%, and water is heavier (no air content) than coal per cubic unit.  A
> further question would be later use of oil by steam engines ­ is water
> heavier than oil (I believe it is)?  Did tenders carrying oil still have
> less than 50% of the tender¹s capacity by volume?
> 
> The simple statement provided here is what discussion is all about.  It may
> well provide the opportunity to think, answer a question or solve a problem,
> but it should leave another opportunity for further discussion and
> education.
> 
> John in Tucson
> ================================================
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/5/11 4:36 PM, "cbqrr47" <cbqrr47@...> wrote:
> 
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >    
> > 
> > In 1940, U S railroads used more tons of water than any other commodity.  
> > Much
> > of it came from company owned lakes and wells. Many of the lakes remain 
> > today.
> > 
> >  
> >    
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>