BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: FW: Morse Code: A Lost Language

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: FW: Morse Code: A Lost Language
From: "teejay0469_2" <t.m.j@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:38:00 -0000
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1292283490; bh=evEj06+lEsuKlWXPrEuHUVptg0d4T7f8DdXjdWJJca8=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JC8MZy92C1haxZCG2hjUQw3V5vHdIgEQ/MCOJhmnoKKRgzfqZBaaFdlZ5WLWAPKfyCKXC67jfgBxv9jqPJmYIlOP9ensGAqmS1t2fxUu8LL0kjjUI5Ns8ourhkDP9BBz
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=tGBAijsEock3Xvqtf30u4u/yD/mDxhx8+0gIEM3BcPRsm4UGZnhfyNyZgxWBOO7d1TbnPtkeh6R5jrio6eqttKT7yTkXg3Uu3y7qlDlMhu+MRn8MbVegyTaweWpUcmTU;
In-reply-to: <BAY113-W44EF240F4007048F08237B8120@phx.gbl>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I am glad I found it and pushed to save it also. You would not believe how many 
old train order ledgers hit the trash can and other assorted unneeded 
paperwork. I was flabergasted when I heard about the cleanout...... "You know 
all this old paperwork is a fire hazard" type of mentality..... At least a few 
of the ledgers were saved.....

Tom Johnson

--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, Gerald Edgar <vje68@...> wrote:
>
> 
> There were commercial RR business schools as well as mail order outfits where 
> such devices were used or purchased as well as by the RR's themselves.  The 
> machine had tapes for various speeds of sending so 'student' could learn by 
> listening and copying once he knew the 'alphabet'.  I recall Scott Arden, 
> large mail order RRiana dealer in Oregon selling off such units from a just 
> closed RR school (Chicago?) in the mid-70's.  When I learned code via US Air 
> Force, the instructor hand sent at slow speeds and then commercial tapes 
> played at various Words Per Minutes (WPM) increments from 7 to 10 to 15 and 
> finally up to 32 which was the minimum you needed to pass.  Once you could 
> receive, it was optional to learn to send but few did as was not req'd (this 
> was "70-71).
>  
> It's great that was saved at the tower.  However I question why the club 
> would have thrown anything away still left in Newport Tower!  I suspect it 
> and Grand Crossing are the only intact towers from the respective RR's 
> "LaCrosse" Division.
> 
> 
> Gerald  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> From: t.m.j@...
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:28:02 +0000
> Subject: [CBQ] Re: FW: Morse Code: A Lost Language
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This has been a very interesting thread and have enjoyed it. It really hit me 
> since I had a desire to learn morse when I was a teenager. I never did but I 
> might have a chance in the near future. To this end, I wanted to let evrybody 
> know about a very unique find that is very relevant to this subject. A 
> railroad club that I use to belong to here in Minnesota is responsible for 
> maintaining and old Joint Milwaukee Road/CB&Q tower that was in Newport 
> Minnesota. 
> 
> I was up in the tower a while back and found a box that had an interseting 
> electronic device in it along with several reels of paper tape. After looking 
> and inspecting it very closely, I found out that it was a morse code 
> tester/sounder. I sequestered the device away to a safe place since the tower 
> was being gone through and all of the "trash" was being thrown out. I 
> definitely did not want this unit being tossed out.
> 
> Since I dropped my membership, I sorta lost track of what happened to the 
> unit, but a couple of months ago, one of our local ham radio groups and 
> railfans held a ham radio event in the tower. I visited and talked with one 
> of the members who is also a club member and asked if he had seen the unit. I 
> had let him know sometime before hand (before I dropped my membership) to 
> keep track of it. He said he pulled it out and fiddled with it and it would 
> start reading the paper tape but than stop and damage the tape. He only let 
> one tape get damaged, but I impressed upon him how important the unit was.
> 
> Now, I just need to find a historian that could reburbish the unit and find a 
> way to copy the paper tapes to new tape so it can be used. I would believe 
> the morse is in true dispatcher format which would be very cool to 
> hear...........
> 
> Tom Johnson
> 
> --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@> wrote:
> >
> > Even after they started to use telephones for train orders, the oldtime 
> > operators would say BK (break)Â when the dispatcher got too fast to copy!
> > 
> > --- On Fri, 12/10/10, Dale Reeves <drale99@> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > From: Dale Reeves <drale99@>
> > Subject: Re: [CBQ] FW: Morse Code: A Lost Language
> > To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:15 PM
> > 
> > 
> > Â  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > My dad, a Q agent/operator, was teaching me to become a helper in '44-'45. 
> > I got so I could send a little. The Navy interrupted my RR carreer. Later 
> > I was in Northwood, ND on the GN in the early 60's The mayor was agent 
> > there. I was in the depot with him, and I started to send on his key. He 
> > was impressed, as he didn't know how to telegraph. Evidently the GN branch 
> > up there wasn't using the telegraph then -- probably around 1962 I would 
> > guess.
> > The thing that always amazed me was how fast those old telegraphers could 
> > send and receive. They abreviated a lot, and they could send over 100 words 
> > a minute. They could really make those sounders sing! My dad claimed he 
> > could send as fast on the key as he could on the bug.
> > Dale Reeves
> > 
> > Dale Reeves
> > Original Message ----- 
> > From: <Jpslhedgpeth@>
> > To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CBQ] FW: Morse Code: A Lost Language
> > 
> > Gerald et al
> > 
> > I seem to remember that 1972 was the last year for telegraph on the Q..but 
> > I 
> > can't point to any particular reference...IIRC the Rock Island quit the 
> > telegraph in1965.
> > 
> > Coincidentally I've been reading through some of my od RR Magazines and 
> > have 
> > recently read some of Palmer's stuff in the 1941 and 42 issues.
> > 
> > When I was braking on the Q 1956-58 the branch lines in Nebraska were all 
> > telegraph and the mainlines had both telegraph and telephone communication.
> > 
> > All of the old head agent-operators were telegraphers..Most of those guys 
> > were 1900-1920 seniority and used mostly the key and sounder.
> > 
> > Some new agents-operators were coming on and most could telegraph a bit but 
> > didn't like to use the key in preference to the phone.
> > 
> > There was a young telegrapher who worked on the Lincoln-Ravenna line as an 
> > extra operator...It was said of "Arch".. "The only thing Arch can use the 
> > key for is to send....FN. ie...."get on the phone"
> > 
> > I've opined in my monthly piece in our local railfans club newsletter that 
> > the new fad "texting" is nothing more than the old telegrapher's 
> > "shorthand"..Those guys never used unnecesary words of letters..
> > 
> > In a story by Don Livingston RR October 1941...."Wt dd u sa wd be ur gess 
> > on 
> > tt local"...Translation..."What did you say would, be your guess on that 
> > local".
> > 
> > Every telegrapher had a sine by which he was known..Harry Bedwell's Eddie 
> > Sand's was DY... Every station had a two letter telegraph call...these were 
> > called in Employee timetables through the 1950's and maybe 
> > later..example..at El Reno, OK on the RI....El Reno freight yard's call was 
> > FO...the passenger depot was RN...There was an old dispatcher...and many of 
> > them did likewise still continued to use the telegraph call on the 
> > phone...I 
> > can still hear old Charlie Forbes..who really didn't need the 
> > telephone...yelling into the phone..."Hello FO" when he wanted El Reno yard.
> > 
> > Pete
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerald Edgar <vje68@>
> > To: cbq <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tue, Nov 16, 2010 11:29 am
> > Subject: [CBQ] FW: Morse Code: A Lost Language
> > 
> > We have not discussed use of Morse Code on the Q to my recollection; anyone 
> > know where on the system was the last use of same? I'm guessing it was 
> > post-BN as I recall a Trains article identifying an ex-GN or SOO line in 
> > No. 
> > Dakota still using Morse in the "80's. When I hired on C&NW in "78 three 
> > stations still used Morse; consecutive stops from Marchalltown east on the 
> > 'main'. These were 3 senior Agt/operators who insisted the Signal gang keep 
> > their wire operational. When they ret'd, that ended Morse on the 
> > Northwestern. 9allefgedly there were some rare opccasiopns
> > 
> > I learned a semblance of American Morse as a Scout and intensive knowledge 
> > of International Morse while in the Air Force; those of you who are old 
> > Ham's learned some as well.
> > 
> > Any stories out there relating to Morse on the Q? I have a RPPC showing a Q 
> > work train with one car clearly marked 'Telegraph Dept'. Dates from 1920's. 
> > I think some old equipment bklts also differentiate between Telegraph Dept 
> > and Signal Dept. Also Western Union had their own work trains that traveled 
> > any & all RR's well into the 60's (even later?)
> > 
> > Gerald
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > "A LOST LANGUAGE", by LeRoy Palmer. An Article appearing in the June,
> > 1940 issue of "Railroad Magazine", pages 89-92.
> > 
> > As months and years drift by, the number of us old-time telegraphers
> > in rail service who know the train wire language is dwindling, like the 
> > "thin blue line" and the "thin gray line" of Civil War veterans.On
> > practically all the main-line dispatching circuits the telephone has
> > displaced the telegraph. Only the oldest ops can remember the days
> > when the average train dispatcher had a "copier", a fast pen operator
> > who wrote all orders in the order book as the dispatcher issued them
> > and checked as each was repeated.
> > 
> > In this era of telephone dispatching, the work is, of course, done
> > much more quickly. Orders are now repeated in one-fourth the time that
> > was required for even the "gilt-edge" Morse man, although the time and
> > all station names are spelled out, while train and engine numbers are
> > repeated on the telephone. The veteran brass pounder has to admit it,
> > even though he misses the vanishing language. Formerly I could be busy at 
> > my 
> > desk, or even reading the newspaper, and still hear the train wire with its 
> > "OS" reports of trains passing over the district, and thus I kept posted on 
> > everything approaching my station. Now I hear nothing unless I sit with the 
> > telephone receiver hung over my head. They took some of the romance and 
> > fascination away from railroading when they installed telephones on the 
> > train wire.
> > 
> > The twelve-hour night shift men were excellent "spotters". That is, they 
> > were adept at catching much-needed sleep when opportunity offered and they 
> > trained themselves to wake for their call. The old Morse dispatchers knew 
> > that Bill or Joe was "in the hay" when they got no answer on the first call 
> > and they would slowly repeat "RC RC RC DS" or "ZA ZA ZA DS," or whatever 
> > the 
> > call was, the repeated chatter bringing the Op to life. This was customary 
> > and was well understood.
> > 
> > One of the first things the op learned was to arouse from deep slumber for 
> > his call.
> > 
> > I remember the first job I ever worked, night operator for the Milwaukee 
> > Road at Burlington, Wis., in 1901. I'd been on the job only a few nights 
> > when. One morning just before daylight, I got mighty sleepy and stretched 
> > out on the freight desk, with an "Official Guide" making a soft pillow for 
> > my head, and was soon sleeping soundly. I dreamed I was walking along a 
> > street, and as I passed a store I heard a telegraph instrument tapping out 
> > "BU BU BU BY" which was my office call. I thought, "Gosh! I'd better go in 
> > there and answer that. It's my call!" The next thing I knew, I was tumbling 
> > off that desk onto my feet as I realized that the Beliot dispatcher was 
> > hammering out slowly "BU BU BU BU DS."
> > 
> > I dove for the telegraph desk.
> > 
> > I have had this same dream, or one very much like it, many times since on 
> > similar occasions. Other old-time ops report having had identical 
> > experience. Seldom would we get deep enough in the hay to fail to recognize 
> > the familiar sounder call. There's not much excuse for lightening slingers 
> > to drowse on an eight-hour shift nowadays, but should a man working the 
> > late 
> > night, or third, trick in the heat of Summer, slip off to dreamland between 
> > trains, the telephone bell is, perhaps, not the equal of the old repeated 
> > Morse call to arouse him from slumber.
> > 
> > Perhaps you have sat in some wayside depot waiting-room and listened to the 
> > clatter of the instruments in the telegraph office and wished you could 
> > understand what was passing over the wire. But missing now from the chorus 
> > of clicking sounders is the loudest one of all, the sounder of the train 
> > dispatcher's wire. What you would hear now, if you could read them, would 
> > be 
> > the message wire and the commercial wire, carrying private telegrams. Gone 
> > is the hottest and fastest of them all, the sounder with the mysterious 
> > abbreviations and language of its own, which every student aspired to read. 
> > When a student could read the train wire his education was complete; he was 
> > a full-fledged op.
> > 
> > In 1900 I was an apprentice at the CMStP&P depot in Elkhorn, Wis. George 
> > Hayes was the daylight operator there. In addition to his regular duties, 
> > he 
> > had the job of teaching two students, Bill Jones and myself. Both of us 
> > were 
> > green farm hands. I don't know how dumb I was as a ham, but I do remember 
> > that Mr. Hayes was in despair over Bill. We both did learn, however. I 
> > became a boomer op, and the last I heard of Bill Jordan he was the chief 
> > dispatcher for some Western pike.
> > 
> > I was given night work with the night man, a short, fat little Irish fellow 
> > named Eddie uinane. Eddie was a prince. He used to send to me faithfully an 
> > hour or so every night when he wasn't too busy, but he was a rotten sender. 
> > The boys along the line had a hard time reading him. But I got accustomed 
> > to 
> > the funny twists he put on his Morse, and I had no trouble. Later on, when 
> > I 
> > was working along the line on the extra board, if some op had to copy Eddie 
> > and I was around he'd make me sit in and take Eddie's dots and dashes.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, I put in about six months with Eddie, showing up when he did at 
> > six p.m. and quitting at one a.m. I was beginning to get discouraged. I 
> > could read words off the Western Union commercial wire pretty well, but I 
> > couldn't get used to those "cut" words used by the dispatchers, even though 
> > I listened faithfully, trying to separate the characters and make sense of 
> > them.
> > 
> > I'll never forget that winter night when I opened the waiting room door, 
> > hustled over to the huge coal stove to thaw out, and heard the big 
> > train-wire sounder in the office rattling away. I listened a moment, when 
> > -- 
> > just like that-- I could read the language! Boy, was I tickled! What 
> > previously had been a jumble of sounds was now clear to me. When Eddie came 
> > in a few minutes later, I had the joyous news for him that I could read the 
> > train wire, and he seemed as pleased as I was.
> > 
> > After that, I was more anxious than ever to perfect myself. One day George 
> > Hayes said to me: "Kid, I'm going to give you a note to W.H. Melchoir, the 
> > chief train dispatcher at Beliot, and send you over to take your 
> > examination. Eddie says you have your block rules learned okay and you can 
> > read the train wire. They need operators and you are good enough to start 
> > out."
> > 
> > Next day I rode the morning local passenger train to Beliot. Mr. Melchoir 
> > examined me and sent me to Burlington to work that very night. There was no 
> > physical or standard rules examination at that time, but you had to know 
> > the 
> > block rules. You had to know how to ask the man east of you for a "47" 
> > before you let an eastbound train into the block, etc. A "block" was the 
> > stretch of track between your office and his, and "47" meant "Will hold all 
> > westbound trains until your train arrives."
> > 
> > Because the Morse train dispatcher had to work fast in order to keep his 
> > trains moving, there came into use so many abbreviations that if, as you 
> > sat 
> > in the wayside station waiting-room listening to the sounders, you could 
> > have to read every letter that was passing over the train wire, you still 
> > would have been unable to know what was going on, unless you understood the 
> > code. You might have heard the dispatcher and the op converse as follows: 
> > "Sa wn x w cmg ma hv 9 r tm." snaps the dispatcher. {Say when extra west 
> > train is coming. I may have orders for them.}
> > 
> > "Art tnk c tr smk no," returns the op. "Es hr ty cm ty in ste nw."
> > {All right. I think I see their smoke now. Yes, here they come. They are in 
> > sight now.}
> > 
> > "U gt nytng r em." asks the DS. {Have you got anything for them?}
> > 
> > "Es abt 15 m wk," replies the operator. {Yes, about 15 minutes work.}
> > 
> > "OK 31 cy 3 r em & let me kw hw mch wk ty gt at DR b4 c clr em ma hv
> > to chg tt meet wi 42 No 7s ab 20 m1 I'll hnd hm sm ti on tm at DR."
> > {Okay. Make 3 copies on a 31 order for them and let me know how much
> > work they've got at Darienbefore you clear them. May have to change that 
> > meet with number 42. Number 7 is about twenty minutes late. I'll hand him 
> > some time on them at Darien.}
> > 
> > Hour after hour, with occasional periods of rest, twenty-four hours a day, 
> > the sounder rattled on, Few words were spelled out in train movement 
> > conversation, as this language -- the "cut" language of the old Morse train 
> > wire -- clicked over the line.
> > 
> > All railroad offices with telephone dispatcher's wire equipment have a
> > Morse circuit to fall back on in case of trouble on the phone wire. The 
> > young operators dread this. If they happen to be working with an old Morse 
> > dispatcher, they are in hot water trying to read his abbreviated 
> > instructions. To a veteran, however, it's the old familiar code.
> > 
> > Morse men admit that the telephone, like the typewriter, makes for greater 
> > efficiency. It standardizes operations, saves time and work, and diminishes 
> > the hazards of the iron trail. But we of the old school miss the romance of 
> > the earlier days of rugged individualism when you reached for a brass key 
> > instead of a black telephone receiver, and were proud of the bold, rapid, 
> > flowing strokes with which you wrote your train orders by hand.
> > 
> > And if a tobacco-chewing boomer op were suddenly yanked out of the dim past 
> > and put to work on a teletype machine, his consternation would be equalled 
> > only by his profanity. Teletypes are doing their bit to make
> > Morse a dead language. So far, you'll find 'em on only a few of the big 
> > roads. The latest pike to install this system is the Erie, which is now 
> > using teletype machines for their consist and passing report systems.
> > 
> > As every rail knows the consist of a freight train includes all of its
> > car numbers, listed in order, beginning at the head end. For each carload 
> > are shown contents, tons, destination, route (including other roads, if any 
> > such are needed to take the car to its destination), and sometimes the name 
> > of the consignee. Ventilation, refrigeration, or heating instructions are 
> > shown for perishable freight, and when livestock was last fed and rested.
> > 
> > All this information, in the case of the Erie, is transmitted by teletype 
> > to 
> > the company's general offices at Chicago, Cleveland, and New York, and to 
> > the district office at Jersey City, NJ, immediately after hotshot freights 
> > have left the yards. There, centralized tracking bureaus use the 
> > information 
> > to answer quickly all shipper and receiver inquiries about the movement of 
> > cars -- inquiries that in days gone by were answered with the aid of Morse 
> > conversation.
> > 
> > A friend on the Erie tells me that when his company adopted teletypes for 
> > its consist and passing report systems, last March, it converted 845 miles 
> > of telegraph wire to printer circuits, making a total of 2,320 miles of 
> > these circuits now in operation on the Erie. Of this total, he says, 2,075 
> > miles are equipped with duplex apparatus over which messages or consists 
> > can 
> > be sent in both directions at the same time.
> > 
> > Morse experts concede that the telephone, the typewriter and the teletype 
> > seldom fail and, as I pointed out, do the work more easily and more 
> > rapidly. 
> > Few train dispatchers and ops would go back to the obsolete system if they 
> > could. But now and then you'll run across a mellow old boomer who sighs for 
> > the snappy Morse dialogue on the dispatcher's wire that is fast becoming a 
> > lost language.
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>