To: | <cbq@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [CBQ] 16 Section Sleeper Conversion |
From: | Rick Keil <rkeil6721@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:19:22 -0600 |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1261830088; bh=ay2ArHcwu8iHZ4CJgkbwesgoKzSkhntC904dakoNpck=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:Importance:In-Reply-To:References:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=b7pBhpk6gbq+7ClDS0jtre1rWkX4dUkHOivDRaBOFB/jiwzNvIt8wrUdQ5NEl/FjcGZfwo2MeajRzLTkSPh7ily/RO/HhJTRjfJnXTqkcNGl53u76UC7lWmcdLMf6Vye |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=kOM5qZkfBaQTyi1qbrDeRy7qhxqWqX0C6y6vRtZWTKVMJWaHxBiMMqCGn6dpnj85AKQuYWE0gqdavTC7N7UChHUByH0wdzfXjN3FX7+XDk+cpJ9CswZl67b+7YfxRv0w; |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <924632.72816.qm@web180102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <924632.72816.qm@web180102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Thanks Ricky > To: cbq@yahoogroups.com > From: sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com > Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:18:57 -0800 > Subject: Re: [CBQ] 16 Section Sleeper Conversion > > I believe the seats were revolving, as on other CB&Q coaches. They thus could > face either way. > > On Thu Dec 24th, 2009 10:24 AM CST Rick Keil wrote: > > > > >The CZ 16 section sleepers were rebuilt to 48 seat coaches in 63-64. > >Externally, it appears no changes were made, what was done internally? I > >assuming the bathrooms would have remained the same, however, which way > >would the new seats have faced, towards the vestabule end? Again, assuming > >here, 12 rows of 4 seats, two on either side of the aisle. > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > >Ricky Keil > > > >Bellevue, NE > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. > >http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/ > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Help with dating BR blotter, Gerald & Virginia Edgar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Help with dating BR blotter, Rick Keil |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] 16 Section Sleeper Conversion, Stephen Levine |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Holiday Recipe, sbmco1990 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |