BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2486

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2486
From: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:39:49 -0400
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=D8GaRe7fK5Z7Q64visDhG/ZW0CedOxVbaNeyEiVJGvuB0BZk6Du29uXcvHXTRY929etlAX0pj+fDweK4I8zd8u8rpJJ72jPGxR4mNUUrDYevF/WsFQWQaRSjwNLNiyZ5;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
I have an overhead shot of #9370 without the 4-stack modification on Castle 
Graphics...

Cheers!

Jan

> 
> From: clipperw@EarthLink.net
> Date: 2005/08/05 Fri AM 10:28:07 EDT
> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2486
> 
> Simon,
> 
> I believe all of the Q's Baldwin VO1000's were delivered on a single 
> order and they all originally had a single short stack near the rear of 
> the hood. Those generally assigned to Kansas City and other western 
> point generally were modified to by the RR to the 4 stack arrangement 
> while, in general, those in the east including Chicago continued to 
> operate with a single stack. Why, I am not sure. Supposedly, the 4 
> stack arrangement relieved an exhaust back pressure problem that was 
> affecting diesel engine operation and maintenance. I am not familiar 
> enough with the Baldwin production to know whether they ever delivered 
> a 4 stack arrangement as original equipment. However, I recall reading 
> that the 4 stack modification was supported and possibly developed by 
> Baldwin engineers. It is also possible that they came up with another 
> design change to correct the problem in production.
> 
> Bill Barber
> 
> On Friday, August 5, 2005, at 06:08  AM, CBQ@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> 
> >  Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:38:43 -0500
> >    From: "Simon Griffin" <SIMON_GRIF@msn.com>
> > Subject: Re: Stewart VO1000
> >
> > Roy, I am no expert on this by any means.  What I have read suggests 
> > that
> > there is not an easy answer to this, and I don't think that there is a
> > definitive list for this.  Evidently, the initial production run of 
> > these
> > had a single low stack at the rear of the hood.  Later ones were 
> > delivered
> > with 4 stacks.  Earlier ones were modified to 4 stacks.  Apparently 
> > not all
> > were modified however.  Perhaps someone else has more definitive 
> > answers to
> > this.  I searched the forum archive and the question was asked several 
> > times
> > when the Stewart model came out, but I did not see any conclusive 
> > answer.
> >
> > Simon
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hpnvgsh/M=362343.6886682.7839641.1493532/D=groups/S=1706043004:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123260002/A=2894350/R=0/SIG=10tj5mr8v/*http://www.globalgiving.com";>Make
 a difference. Find and fund world-changing projects at GlobalGiving</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>