BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] Re: Burlington Locomotives

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Locomotives
From: "Tim VanMersbergen" <killercarp@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:14:59 -0000
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <6.2.0.14.2.20050108104947.102b6ec0@pop3.concentric.net>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

In passenger service they may have figured it out quickly, but in 
freight operations, they never did.  It is ironic that almost none 
all the freight cab units had nose MU connections, so the freight 
department never enjoyed the same flexibility.  One would think the 
advantages that were clear in passenger operations could also be 
applied to freight.
Tim VanMersbergen



--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, Bob Webber <rswebber@c...> wrote:
> Which is why you always see them running Elephant style.  Here is 
another 
> example of the Q being smarter in using their money.  B units for 
this 
> application for a railroad like the CB&Q just didn't make sense - 
it made 
> for too inflexible arrangements.  If you look at the consists 
published 
> with the Zephyrs, you';ll note that the locomotive consists 
fluctuated 
> often with the trains.  Being able to pull a unit off easily 
regardless of 
> which one made for increased efficiency.  And, when it came time to 
be 
> bumped to the commuter trains, they didn't have to add cabs to B 
units the 
> way that the C&NW did.  Say what you will about the Q - it usually 
didn't 
> take them long to figure out the way to run things that would be 
the most 
> efficient for the long term.  Whether that be using unpainted 
stainless 
> (that cut down on maintenance costs) or not using cabless power - 
they 
> figured it out fairly quickly.
> 
> At 10:41 AM 1/8/2005, you wrote:
> 
> >While some of the Burlington E7's carried a "B" suffix in their 
number, the
> >were in fact "A" Units, in other words they had a cab. The 
Burlington didn't
> >own any E7,E8,or E9 "B" Units. The only E "B" Units they owned 
were the E5 
> >B's.
> >
> >Hope this helps you,
> >
> >Loren Johnson





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Rcy2bD/UOnJAA/cosFAA/8ZCslB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>